HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - January 15, 1992 (61)4�
CITY OF L ODI
AGENDA TITLE: Plans ano '3pecifications fin(' Advertisr!cnent for Eads for
Demolitirr of Elevatf,0 ''atRr Stcrage Tank. 114 North ►air. Street
MEETING DATE: January 15, 1992
PREPARED BY: Public Works Director
RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council approve the plan!, dnd specifications for
the above project and authorize advertising for bids.
BACKGROUND IN CPMAT1ON: This project is for the removal and disposal of the old
elevated water tank and tower. The tank, constructed
around 1910. does not meet current earthquake standards. A
study performed by PTack & Veatch in I978 concluded that
the tank should be replaced in lieu of tryina to repair the aginv structure.
Although still serviceahle. the lack of a ready market for used tanks, coupled with
expensive dismantling_ and transportation costs means the tank will prohably be cut
up and sold as scrap steel. Early last year, we contacted dismantlers in California
and across the country. They agreed that, considering the tvpe and age of tank,
demolition would probably be the most cost effective alternative.
Coupled with this project i s the removal of the old ?ail uoilding and throe storage
sheds previously used by the Parks and Recreation Department. These structures are
adjacent to the old water tank and their removal w i i I make the tank removal easier.
The removal of the tank and structures w i I I allow the Parks and Recreation
Department to use this area for the storacxr of materials and vehicles.
Attached, as information only, arr Exhibits A and R. Exhibit A i s a copy of the
February 17. 1988 Council meetinv minutes and discu5sior of the historical
significance of, and decisions reqardinq. the old j a i l huildirla. Exhibit B i s a
copy of the Council Communication and recommendation along with the negative
declaration and support documents hreseri .F,d at t.hP Fehroary 17, i988 Council meeting
which relate to the removal of the old Jail huildinq.
As per the City Council decision in 19B8, the various ,)rc.hitectural featurps of the
old jail bui ldinq w i i I be salva()vd by thr contractor as part of thi,, demolition
contract.
APPROVED
T140MAS A PETERSON ....�
City Manngor
cc '
CWATERST/TX1W.02M (CO.COW 7, 109?
Plans and Specifications and Advertisement for Rids for
Demolition of Elevated Water Storage lank, 114 North Main Street
January 15, 1992
Paqe 2
FUNDING: Originally Budgeted: 1990/1991
Budgeted Fund: Water Capital Outlay
Total Project Estimate: 555,000
Bid Opening Date: February 5. 92
/ Ja' k L. Ronsko
is Works Director
Prepared by Mark Lindseth. Associate Ciril Engineer
JLR/ML/lm
Attachments
cc: Purchasing Officer
Waiver/Wattp-- Superintendent
Lodi i, j, r I-ommi ttee, Attn: Ralph Lea
Marr L.
CWATERST/TXTW.02M. (CO.COM` January 7, I992
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Exhibit A
DUBLIC HEARING TO
Nonce thereof having been published according to law. an
:ONSIDER APPROVING
dffidavit of which publication is on file in the office of
rHE NEGATIVE
the City Clerk. Mayor Pro Tempore Snider called for the
)ECLARATION AND
Public Hearing Co consider and approve the negative
INITIAL STUDY. INCLUDING
declaration for the city buildings demolition project (old
' iNDINGS FOR CITY
city jail and storage buildings).
31JILDINGS DEMOLITION
'ROJECT (OLD CITY
JAIL AND STORAGE
ouncil was reminded that on December 16, 1987, the Lodi
3UILDINGS)
l,itY Council agreed to delay demolition of the old city
jail. pending development of a study to determine the
:C -53(a)
historical significance of ;he building. To this end, the
'C-121.
Commisni ty Development Department conducted an initial 5 tudY
in accordance with Section 21,000 et sea. of the California
Public Resources Code, with cooperation from the San
Joaquin County Historical Iluseurl and the Jail Committee,
headed by Codians Anne 14eyers Gnd Kartia Serna. The scope
of the study includes all structures within the project
site, except the old fire hall. lvhich are being considered
for demolition and may be of son1e possible historical
significance.
The Staff report eras given by Community Development
Director Schroeder and Associate Planner Rarnum.
Addressing the Council regarding the matter were the
following:
Marie Elena Serna. 801 t-test Elm Street. Lcdi
'laomi Carey. :02 14e5t Oak Street, Lodi
There being no other persons in :he audience wishing to
speak on the matter. the public portion of :he hearing vias
closed.
On motion of Council Member Hinchn!,in, Reid second, Council
certified the Subject :R{iative Declaration and Initial
Study acid esLabl ishr,d '_he following I lridlncl;:
A.sre5uit of ;mysicaI cteter1oriLioo and 1ocaIi ed
der11ol ition, 910 !)Lll Iding5 ;1t nit 1Can(.e ,is it historic
resour- his oini1n1'i►w <<n EnslcinitIcarit level.
buildinns' .;,,s t hi,.[;lrlcol rntt rrty wullid Cause
't1eln La hw inel i�iolr> ;or mclusion in the NaCionil
«'(?IjI to olr,;l I'1a S,
fetermintd that 'hle r;,po .. d I)rnl�Ct v�llh not res 11 t In
i - i'illlt l(=tnt 1 n[l,rt n [l1 FT lrnritTiert 'I ,T;lrlc3 1
r!(} '11 iii t7V0' 1C Ii'n I'Pqu1r-(.-d
1
0F 2
CITY CF LO DI
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Continued February 17, I988
Exh bit
Cn notion of Counr_i P Member Winchman, Pinkerton second,
Council directed Staff tU proceed with implementing the
proposed discretionary measure regarding historic
presercation as outlined in the 411.tor,c and Architectural
Assessment as listed
Discretionary treasures - Historic Preservation
Although significant effects will not result from the
project, additional measures may be taken at the City's
discretion to reduce irreversible effects of the project
toward the collection of salvageable historic materials.
1. That a qualified professional historian develop an
historical interpretiv- and photo documentation of the
buildings.
2. That architectural elements of the structure (e.g.
dates, arches, filigree. cornices and cement blocks) be
incorporated into the new construction onsite, using
the following example:
Architectural elements may be incorporated into an interior
wall of a building `oyer which will be open to the public.
Interpretives wouid also be Icorporated into in interior
design which Ilouid focus "n ,3n historic Motif o i the City.
On notion jf Council 1*1.f'111tb('r 41,1rs(-_hri n, Pini.et't,)n Second.
I.ciunr: i i a rec ted ) to T 'rs 1)repa ro i ,)roposa l f or tho
:'stabl ishment. of a
City X71 ;i(irlCdi : lIl ldln(, 1'�'Si'1'Vtli.11'tl
Count t tee .
curth4'r, c)n 71otIt)n c)f Cill3TIC il ''€'!!br'r- u"1d, 'iint'1'f<Irl n(1.
Coir( --ll '3utllrr1:(?It tht, ri."' 1111f;: ,;c.l,:iiti. ,
profs', -gonia 111 ;Lorio:r i0 :i'V'[o;) fr) FI i`,Lo1';t',`!
111tt'!�^rE'- .:t.' �lf:tt p ho*_€3 oc-,jr1f'r!,.'i'. I,ff1 1 '.1;i, ;k&D,
qui ld1nCS
nr: rhe Cwt° tlr,3i
?OF2
C O U N C I L
TO,, THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
Exhibit B
C0�-�irlUll I r,aT 1 C�
COUNCIL MEE', �!G DATE:
FEERUAR'( L7, I968
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION 88-01 CITY OF LODI EUILDINGS OENOL M ON
RECOMMENDED ACTICN: That the City of Lodi consider and approve the proposed Negative
Declaration and Initial Study for the above project, to specifically include recommended
findings provided by the Initial Study, prior to project authorization. Also, that the
City of Lodi consider preservation measures which may be taken oL the City's discretion.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On December L6, 1987. the Lodi City Council agreed to delay
demolition of the old city jail, pending development of a study to determine the historical
significance of the building. To this end, the Community Development Department conducted
an initial study in accordance with Section 21,000 et seq. of the California Public
Resources Code, with cooperation from the San Joaquin County Historical Museum and the Save
the Jail Committee. headed by Lodians Anne Meyers and Maria Serna. The scope of the study
includes all structures within the project site, except the old fire hall, which are being
considered for demolition and may be of some poos,�sjible historical significance.
K&tftm IV
Rick Barnum
< Associate Planner
RS:jj
COOINCO23
TXT:, . QZU
IEZATWE Di1FLAM TION
Notice is hereby given that the City of Lodi Planning Department bas
d8terminQd tnat the following ;roposal will have no "Significant
Impact on the Environment". Supporting documentation is available
in the form of a "Preliminary Environmental Assessment" and is avail-
able for putlic review in the Planning Department Office. City Hall
Building. 221 �4. Pine Street. Anyone wishing to appeal the issuance
of this Dec'iration to the Planning Co+rmission may do so no later than
the date in:'sated as "Last date to Appeal".
Date January 27, 19^; Project Title: ND -88-01
CITY OF LODI BUILDINGS QCNOL [ T [ON
Responsible Agency: Lodi Planning Not, Contact Person: RICK BARNUM
NAME OF PERSON. FIRM, OR AGENCY UNDERTAKING PROJECT:
CITY OF LDDI
Address:
Associate Planner
City: County:
221 W. PINE STREET LODI SiMli JOAQU IN
Area Code: (209) Phone;
333-6711
PROJECT DESCRIPTION OF NATURE. PURPOSE. AND LOCATION
The project consists of clearinq portions of City oroperty (Parks1� Recreation
<::t', 125 N. Stock:ton Street and 122 N. Main Street (corner
lot), Lodi CA. Clearing shall include demolition of structures. renioval and
d i s,posa l of concrete, hr i c I: , S teff 1 , and other i nc i den t i l and re l a t secs
Project Location City Project Location County
LODI SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
Las,, Date t0 Appea i : ddres5 'rlhere Pre i inti nary nv)ronmen
Assessment is Available
Februar-Y 8. 1911n
LODI CITY PLANNING DEPT.
221 W. Pine St., Codi, CA 95240
Phone: (209) 334-5634
Environr-.t-ntaI rtS-it'Ss{-ent
INIMIL STUDY
1. PROJECT TITLE Citv of Lodi Builder's Demolition
2. LOCATION 125 FJ. Stockton Street: 122 N. Main Street Lodi. CA
3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Droject consists of clearing a portion
of the property at the above locations, including demolition of structures,
removal and disposal ofconcrete, brick, steel, and other incidental
and related work.
4. General Plan Designation (A) Existing (city), (B) Proposed
Public (Existing designation, no change proposed!
5. Site description and surrounding land use Of Structurn5
associated with City parks and Recreation D(marLmu_itiLr��jon5 t0 ;nrd„rle
a COrDQrntA Ynrrd and nffinec� Snrrnt,nriing lane' l �,_:S rr,;.Ltr-Yr ja1_
6. Zoning (A) Existinr,, (B) Proposed Pt,hlir (Fxi-tinn znniwiq no charaC Drop sQ ed).
Will the Project Have a Significant Effect
Through Anv of the Fol lo,vin(I In,paCts.? Yes No `AVbe
7. a. Substantial a!teration of natural topography. soil
or subsoil features ...................................
b. Substantially degrade surface or ground -water quality.. X
C. Substantially deplete surface or groundwater Y
resources . ............................................
d. Substantially interfere with groundwater Flow
or recharge ........................................... X
e Cause a significant affect related to Flood. erosion
or siltation ......................................... X
f Substantial interference �•ri th the habt tat c)l ,vny
species of fish. wi id1 i fe or plant .................... X
Q • Violate ambient a r qua i t sr andard, or cr•e,jte
substantial a i r er,ri tis inns or ob iec t i onabIi, corm ...... r
h. Substantially increase avbient n,�i
level for adjo>ninsd areas ...................
Y
i Substantial reduction of exi ;t int; cropland.. .. X
j Expose individuals t)r property to qcc loch . putil is
health, traffic. Flonk!., seismic �)r othor- h,i7%)rcls>. ..... ti;
Adverse impacts of project and their magnitude:
Refer to attachpd Historic and Architectural Assessments.
Mitigation Measures to Reduce Adverse Impacts Identified by lnitial Study:
Nn mitictation measures are proposed.
RECOMMENDATION
X Negative Declaration EIR Conditional Negative
Declaration
JAMES B. SCNROEDER
Environments Review fficer
r- /
Date 1-21—a
EiR/�-Rt
Yes No Maybe
k.
Have a su£rstantial, demonstrable, negative aesthetic
effect...............................................
X
1.
Result in the disruption or alteration of an
archeological, historical or paleontological site,...
X
M.
Cause or allow substantial increase in consumption in
any natural resources ................................
X
n.
Results in the use or waste of substantial amounts of
fuel or energy .......................................
X
o.
Necessitate major extensions of water. sewer. storm
drain, electrical lines or public roads ..............
X
p.
Substantially increase demand for or utilization of
public services such as schools or fire or police
protection ...........................................
X
q.
Substantially change transportation patterns related
to existing traffic load, street capacity, parking
X
availability or traffic safety .......................
r.
Induce substantial growth, concentration or displace-
ment of population ...................................
X
S.
Result in an alteration or conflict with existing or
plannedland uses ...................................
X
t.
Conflict with adopted plans, goals or policies of
the City of Lodi ....................................
X
Adverse impacts of project and their magnitude:
Refer to attachpd Historic and Architectural Assessments.
Mitigation Measures to Reduce Adverse Impacts Identified by lnitial Study:
Nn mitictation measures are proposed.
RECOMMENDATION
X Negative Declaration EIR Conditional Negative
Declaration
JAMES B. SCNROEDER
Environments Review fficer
r- /
Date 1-21—a
EiR/�-Rt
Building Group 1.
H?SrOP:C AND ARCHITECTURAL ASSESSMENTI
PRC�ECi TILE City of Lodi Building Demolitions (Phase I)
PART a. I€iENTIFICAT 101.
1. Cor mon "tare: Storage Building
2. Historic nare (if known)
Unknown
3. Street address 125 N. Stockton Street
City Lodi Zip 95240 County San Joaquin
4. Assessor Parcel Humber 0
5. Present owrer (il known) City of Lodi
Address 221 W. Pine Street City Lodi Zip 95240
Ownership is: Public X Private
6. Present Use: Storaqe Original Use Unknown
Other past uses Unknown
PAR; B. DESCRIPTION
7. Describe the present physical apvearance of the site or structure and
describe any major alterations from i t s original condition:
The subject building was constructed i n two parts, one in 108 and the
other 1921. Construction i s of unreinforced concrete block. Although
painted white, the concrete block displays its original "split face" '
appearance and wreath patterns. Building sides consist of a low parapet i
wall with a "dart ana eggshell" cornice. The portion of the bui ldin;
dated 1908 has a sealed entrance and windows. Over each square window
i s an ornamental arch with cast concrete filigree. The adjacent cocoon
wall addition (1921) consists only of a large garage door opening. The
building exists i n a state of deterioration, with massive, continuous
sidewall fractures a t various locations. The building roof leaks pro-
fusely, causing interior Rioisture conditions and wood rot.
8. i.ocarionaI map and phoagraphfs), including dares of enclosed
,hofograph( s),
(Refer to Exhibits C & D Attached)
9. Approximate property size:
Lot size (in fwl Frontage
Depth
or Approximate acr:ace
I
172' X 323' (corner lot)
1.3 Acres
10. Condition (Check One)
Excellent Good Fair Deteriorated X
11. Surroundings; (Check more than one if necessary)
a. Open Space X (park) d. Residential
b. Scattered b0 idings e. Commercial X
c, Densely built-up f. Industrial
g, Other (describe)
12. Threats to site:
a. None known d. Residential
b Private development e. Commercial
c. Zoning f. Industrial
g. Other X
(Describe) City Facility Expansion - Demolition
1J, Primary exterior building material:
a. Stone c. stucco e. Wood
b, Brick d. Adobe Block f. Other
(Describe) Concrete Block
14. is the primary exterior building material original?
Yes X No
:5. :s the structure
a. On its original site? X b. Moved?� Unknown?
16. Year of initial construction 1908 & 1921
This date is: a. Factual X
b. Estimated
17. Architect (if kncwn): Unknown
18. Builder (if known): Unknown
19. Architectural style: None (simplistic block building)
PART C SIGNIFICANCE
20. Briefly state historical and/or architectural importance (include
dates, significant historical events, lives of persons significant in
our past. distinctive architectural characteristics. potential to yield
historical information, etc.)
(Refer to Part C Attached)
BUILDING GROUP A
NISTCRIC AND ARCHITECTURAL ASSESSMENT
PRG.!ECT TITLE City of Lodi Building Demolitions (Phase I)
PART A. IDENTIFICATION
1. Cor=.on Name: Storage Buildings (2)
2. Historic name (if known) Unknown
3. Street address Interior Alley - between Main & Stockton Streets
4.
City Lodi Zip 95240 County San Joaquin
Assessor Parcel Number -0-
Present owr€r (i` known) City of Lodi
Address 221 W. Pine St.
Ownership is
Public X
City Lodi Zip 95240
Private
6. Present Use: Storage Original Use
Other past uses
PART B. DESCRIPTION
Unknown
Unknown
7. Describe the present physical appearance of the site or structure and
describe any major alterations from its original condition:
The subject buildings are constructed with unreinforced concrete block,
and are of their natural concrete color. The concrete block displays
its original "split face" appearance, and wreath patterns. The wreath
pattern block i s located only at the building corners. The building
has numerous small doors or openings. which are sealed. The peaked
roof is totally deteriorated with dry rot and shingles are missing,
exposing the rafters underneath. Sidewalls of the building have
continuous sidewall fractures, and evidence of post repairs.
S. Locational map and photecraph;s), includinc dates of enclosed
photograph(s).
(Refer to Exhibits C & D attached)
9. Approximate property size:
Lot size (in feet) Frontage
Depth
or Approximate acrrzage
10. Condition (Check One)
Excellent Good
172' x 323' (corner lot)
1-3
F a i r Deteriorated X
11. Surroundings: (Check more than one if necessary)
a.
Open Space X park
d.
Residential
b.
Scattered buildings
e.
Co=, ercial X
c.
Densely built-up
f.
Industrial
g.
Other (describe)
12. Threats
to site:
a.
None known
d.
Resideotial
b.
Private development
e.
Commercial
c.
Zoning
f.
Industrial
g.
Other X
(Describe) City Facility expansion
- demolition.
13. Primary exterior building material:
a. Stone C. stucco e. Wood
b. Brick d. Adobe Block f. Other
(Describe) Concrete block
14. is the primary exterior wilding material original?
Yes X No
la. is the struc,ure
a. On its original site? X b. Moved? Unknown?
16. Year of initial construction 1908
This date is: a. Factual X
b. Estimated
17. Architect (if kncwn): Unknown
18. Builder (if kncwn): Unknown
19. Architectural style: None (simplistic block building)
PART C SIGI2IFICA%CE
20. Briefly state historical and/or architectural importance (include
dates, significant historical events, lives of per:)ns significant in
our past. distinctive architectural characteristics. potential to yield
historical information, etc.)
(Refer to Part C attached]
-I-
Ri in nmir, u
HT.STGR;C AK ARC::Ti CTURAL ASSESSMENT
PRG,:ECT T i'L= City of Lodi Building Demolitions (Phase I)
PART A. IDENT IFI CATION
1. Common "tare: Old Jail
2. Historic name (if known) Unknown
3. Street. address 122 N. Main Street
City Lodi Zip 95240 County San Joaquin
4. Assessor Parcel Number -0-
5. Present owner (i; known) City of Lodi
Address 221 W. Pine Street City Lodi Zip 95240
Ownership is: Public X Private
b. Present Use: Storaqe Original Use Municipal Jail
Other past uses None
PART B. DESCRIPTION
7. Describe the present physical aoyearance of the site or struct:Jre and
describe any major alterations from its original condition:
The subject building measures 20' wide by 30' long, and i s constructed
with unrtinforced concrete block. The block displays its original
"split face" appearance. The west gable peak displays the building
date (1908). The east gable end retains original attic ventilation
tubes, which measure 18" diameter. The roof consists of corrugated
sheet metal. The original wooden j a i l door remains in place at the
building's only entrance, and windows remain barred. The interior
cell fixtures and doors have been removed. Modern alterations con-
sist of exterior electrical conduit. service panels, lighting, rain
gutter and additional roof mounted vents. The building exists i n a
state of deterioration, with massive, continuous sidewall fractures
at various locations. The building's rafter ties have been cut over
past years to accomodate attic storage, thereby increasing side wall
fa ilure.
S
Locational r;ap and pbot*rraph"s), including dazes of enclosed
;,hotocra�.h(s},
(Refer to Exhibits C and D attached).
9. Approximate property size:
Lot size (in feet) frontege
Depth
or Approximate acreaoe
172' x 323'
1.3 acres
10. Condition (Check One)
Excellent Good Fair Deteriorated X
11. Surroundings: (Check more than cne if necessary)
a, Open Space d. Residential _
b, Scattered buildings e. Commercial X
c. Densely built-up f. Industrial _
g. Other (describe) _
12. Threats to site:
a.
None known _
d.
Residential
b,
Private development --._
e.
Corm, Pr•c i a l
c.
Zoning
f.
Industrial
g.
Other X
(Describe) City facility expans, ion
- demolition
13, Primary
exterior building material:
a.
Stone C. stucco
e. Wood
b.
Brick d• Adobe Block
f. Other Y
(Describe) Concrete block
:4. :s the Primary exterior buildin5 material original?
Yes x No
:S. IS the structure
a. On its original site? -x- b. Moved? Unknown?
16. Year of initial construction 1908
This date is: a. Factual x
b. Estimated
17. Architect (if known): Unknown
18. Builder (if known): Unknown
19. Architectural style: None (simplistic block building)
PART C SIGNIFICANCE
20. Briefly state historical and/or architectural importance (include
dates, significant historical events. lives of persons significant in
our past. distinctive architectural characteristics, potential to yield
historical information, etc.)
(Refer to Part C Attached)
-I-
PART C. SIGNIFICANCE
Di sct ,;s i on
For purposes of this study. the lead agency has elected to utilize standards
established by the Hational Register of Historic Places to evaluate and determine
the historic significance of the ouildings in question. The National Register of
Historic Places is designed to be used by the general public, local communities,
state governments and federal agencies in their preservation planning efforts.
(Refer to Exhibit A: Eligibility Criteria). By utilizing the National Register
Criteria, the historic significance of the buildings in question and their
eligibility for the National Register can be determined in the following manner:
Determination of Historical Significance
National Reoister Criteria. Standards for inclusion consists of meeting all of
the following:
1. Category of Historic Property
The property in question consists of several buildings.
2. Historical Context (Theme)
The subject buildings can be found to be representative of the following
historical themes:
A. Type of building construction (Perrin Bros. Compan,;);
Information/topic ;Early City of Lodi municipal operations; early I900's
law enforcement and social attitudes).
3. Type of Significance
A. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION
The Perrin Bros Company of Lodi manufactured concrete building materials in
Lodi from 1908 to 1915. and most particiilarly cast concrete block. Perrin
Bros. was also known to construct curbs and sidewalks in Lodi, as well as the
cast concrete globe light standards which still dominate many neighborhoods in
Codi.
Perrin block can be noted as a type of building material which has
characteristics that are distinctive, and therefore capable of being placed
into a separate category unto itself.
As a type of building construction, the use of concrete block may be considPred
significant by its association with the tmanv. roc wrf�r. The Perrin Bros. Company
may be considered locally significar.4, due to the influence or distinctive
impression the company made upon the community during its existence. The
lasting impression of Perrin faros, Company is self f,vident throughout Lodi,
from sidewalks, to light standards. to the presence of many distinctive
residential and commercial buildings.
Overall, the buildings in question display no' particular identifiable
architectural style. However, in the historical context, the old jail and
storage buildings possess characteristics which are notably "Perrin Company".
such as conspicuous date blocks. cornices, cement filigree. and "split fUce"
textures.
B. HISTORIC INFORtIATION
The chief value of the buildings is their association with the history of
Lodi's city government, in that they have been utilized as a part of the city's
early municipal operations. Most particularly, the jail building may lend
information about social attitudes in law enforcement at the turn of the
century.
4. Integrity
In tle context of historical property, integrity is the authenticity of the
property's historic identity, as evidenced by the survival of physical
characteristics that existed during the buildings historic period. For the
purpose of establishing historic integrity, it is important to note that the
buildings in question have suffered significant physical deterioration over the
years. and have been officially determined by the City Building Official to be
structurally unsound and not suitable for any purpose. (Refer to Exhibit 6),
In addition to its advanced physical deterioiation, the jail has been altered
` for other uses, causing the removal of cell fixtures and interior door
hardware. Only the presence of barred windows and a "barred" wcoden door
suggests that the building was at one time used as a jail. The other remaining
buildings under discussion have also had their interiors removed or altered for
storage, and exterior windows and doors have been sealed. (Refer to Exhibit C)
The loss of important physical components resulting from deterioration and
localized demolition significantly diminished thei4 4i11Y Of the resource,
and thus the overall historical integrity of the b6 grhals iLn question.
FINDINGS
�. As a result of physical deterioration and localized demolition, the buildings'
significance as a historic resource has diminished to an insignificant level.
2. The buildings' loss of historical integrity would cause them to be ineligible
for inclusion in the National Register of Historical Places, therefore, it
has been determined that the proposed project will not result in a significant
impact on the environment (historical resources), and that no mitigative action
is required.
DISCRETIONARY MEASURES - Historic Preservation
Although significant of forts wi 1 1 not result from the project, acid i t i ona l ne isurc2s
may be taken at the City's discretion to r•educp i -revef-s i b i o effects of the project
toward the collection of saIvagable historic ii�atorials.
PART/C/TKTO,018 -2-
C
1. That a qualified professional historian develop a historical interpretive and
photo documentation of the buildings.
2. That architectural elements of the structures (e.g. dates, arches, filigree,
cornices and cement blocks) be incorporated into the new construction onsite,
using the following example:
Architectural elements may be incorporated into an interior wall
of a building foyer which will be open to the public. interpretives
would also be incorporated into an interior design which would focus
on a historic motif of the City.
Attachments
PART/C/TXTD .01B -3-
EXHIBIT A
NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
The standards for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places consists of
meeting all of the following eligibility criteria:
1. Category of Historic Property
A historic property must be a district, site, building, structure or object.
2. Historical Context (theme)
A historic property must possess significance in American history, architecture,
archaeology, engineering. or culture. The property must be representative of
significant themes. or patterns in the history, architecture, archaeology,
engineering or culture of the relevant geograpl-,ical area (Lodi), and must
possess characteristics that make it a good representative of those themes.
NOTE: A theme may be defied by an event or series of events; a developmental
force; an association with the life of a significant person; by one building
type, period, or method of construction; or by information on a particular tcpic.
3. Type of Significance
A historic property must meet one or more of the following specific criteria.
and be established within the context of a historical theme.
A. The property may be associated with an event(s) that have made a
significant contribution to the broad pattern of our history. (community,
state, or national level).
B. The property may be associated with the lives of persons significant in
our past.
C. The property may embody the distinctive Characteristics of a type, period,
or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that
which possesses high urfistic values.
NOTE: Embodying the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or
method of construction means illustrating the way in which a property was
conceived, desicned, or fabricated by a people or culture in post periods
of history.
D. The property may presently yield, or have the potential to yield important
informdtion in history. Such information consists of some aspect of
history, including events, processes, institutions, design, construction.
settlement. migration, ideals, beliefs, lifeways, and other facets of the
development or maintenance of cultural systems.
4. Integrity
A historic property must possess integrity. Integrity is the authenticity of a
property's historic identity. evidenced by the survival of physical
characteristics that existed during the property's historic period. Integrity
applies to the historic resource in seven ways:
A. Location: The historic resource is at the place it was originally
constructed.
9. Design: The design of buildings reflects its historical
function and available technologies of the period.
C. Setting: Setting is the physical environment of the building.
As opposed to location, setting illustrates the
character of the place in which the resource played its
historical role. The physical features of a historic
setting may be the spatial relationships of other
buildings around the property.
D. Materials: Materials are the physical elements that were combined
to form the site. building, or structure in a
particular period in the past. The choice of materials
can provide information about preferences of those who
created the property, and about the availability of
particular types of materials and technologies. The
irtegrity of such materials determines whether or not
an authentic historic resource still exists.
Workmanship: Workmanship is the physical evidence of crafts of a
particufar culture or people during a period of
history, which reveals individual, local, regional, or
national applications of technological practices and
aesthetic principles. (Tooling, joinery. painting.
etc.)
F. Feeling: Feeling is the quality a historic resource has in
evoking the historic sense of a past period of time.
Although intangible, feeling depends upon the presence
of physical characteristics to convey the historic
quality. It may require the presence and inteofity of
the historical setting.
G. A�;ociation: Association is the direct link between a property and
an Pvent or person. If a property has "integrity of
association", then the property is the place where the
event or activity occurred and it adequately conveys
that relationship.
N1STCR/1/TXTD.J16 -2-
EXHIBIT B
MEMORANDUM, City of Lodi, Community Development Department
TO: CITY MANAGER
FROM: Roger G. Houston, Chief Building InspectorJ�1
DATE: January 15. 1988
SUBJECT: General Findings --Old Jail Building
Storage Buildings
114 North Main Street
General inspection of the Old Jail building revealed its construction to
be as follows:
1. Building floor is concrete.
2. Building walls are unreinforced, hollow. concrete masonry
blocks.
3. The roof has a truss system.
There are several major cracks in the masonry walls. Some of these
cracks are large enough that one is able to see through the walls.
The integrity and strength of the roof truss system has been destroyed
largely due to the fact that the bottom cords were cut and removed to
make room for storage.
In general. the jail is structurally unsound and deteriorated to such an
extent that it should not be used for any purpose.
The masonry storage buildings are in as bad or worse condition than the
jail.
RGH: dsg
cc: James B. Schroeder
Rick Barnum
STOCKTON ST.
WS
1 �
I I w
i I �
I I i
-1S NIbW
r
I w I
I i ow I
EXHIBIT C
j
-1S NIbW
r
I w I
I i ow I
EXHIBIT C
EXHIBIT D
EAST ELEVATION 125 N. blain St.
c. 1921 addition i s to the right
EAST EUVAT10% Cornice, date, ,ind
w i ndo:r itrch de ti i I
[TEST ELEVATION Excessive moisture
conditions are evident.
s
e �
1 :S. 1
h
ELE."ATION noonf rot is. evide-)t
W to the lert of :!dr'apet ':td� I .
WEST ELEMAITEIN Old Jail Facility
Perrin Block pattern is visible.
SOUTfj FLEVATION hall cpening4
left from cell fixture ,-(— mal
NORTH G EAST ELEVATIONS l:ooden
door and vent tubes are visible.
SOUTH ELEVATION UeUil of mall
o{)ening. Hock i; unreinforced.
Nr
f j
i+,,�.► w..rr-�
j'4 • . s • f
wo
at
SOUTH ELEVATION UeUil of mall
o{)ening. Hock i; unreinforced.
SOUTH ELEVATION Wall failure is
evident. Crack width is +1"
SOUTH ELEVATION Blattl failure and ALLEY STORAGE UDGS, Roof is rotted.
patch ,•,or -k. Wreaths etre vi ;i ,l(). - — £ldq. cornor ,jas "rounded" by vehicle,'"
•
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
TO REVIEW AND APPROVE A NEGATIVE DECLARATION
FOR THE CITY BUILDINGS DEMOLITION PROJECT
(OLD CITY JAIL AND STORAGE BUILDINGS)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Wednesday, February 17, 1988 at the
hour of 7;30 pm., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, the
Lodi City Council will conduct a public hearing to review and approve a
negative declaration for the city buildings demolition project (old
city jail and storage buildings) .
Copies of the subject negative declaration are available in the City
Clerk's office. 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, and may be obtained during
regular business hours.
Additional information regarding this item may be obtained from Mr.
Richard Barnum, Associate Planner, Community Development Department,
221 West Pine Street, Lodi. California (telephone - 333-6711). All
interested persons are invited to present their views and toment.s on
this matter. Written statements may be filed with the City Clerk at
any time prior to the hearing scheduled herein and oral statements may
be made at said hearing.
If you challenge the subject matter in court you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the Public
Hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered
to the City Clerk, 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, California, at or prior
to, the Public Hearing.
By Order Of the Lodi City Councii:
(�tCCL �}r %•
Alice M. Reimche
City Clerk
Dated: February 4. 1988
Approved as to form:
Ronald M. Stein
City Attorney
CITY COUNCIL
!MMES W RNKERTON, Mayor
PHILLIP A PENNINO
Mayor Pw Tanmae
D410 M HINCHAMN
K K A SIEGL.00K
IOHN R, Ob dy) SNIDER
CITY OF LODI
Lodi Historical Committee
c/o Mr. Ralph Lea
15900 N. Locust Tree Rd.
Lodi, CA 95240
CITY HALL. 221 WEST PINE STREET
P.O. BOK 3006
LODI, CALIFORNIA 952414910
QW) 334-5634
tiuc t.V% 333.&95
January 8, 1992
THOOMS A. PrrtwsaN
Cety moms"
ALICE M. REIMCHE
City Cwk
KX WNATr
Cky AMm"
SUBJECT: Plans and Specifications and Advertisement for Bids for
Demolition of Elevated Water Storage Tank, 114 North Main Street
Dear Mr. Lea:
Enclosed i s a copy of background information on an item that w i I I be
discussed at the City Council meeting on Wednesday, January 15, 1992, at
7:30 p.m. The meeting w i I I be held i n the City Council Chamber, Carnegie
Form. 305 West Pine Street. You are welcome to attend.
If you wish to communicate with the City Council, please contact Alice
Reimche, Cfty Clerk, a t (209) 333-6702.
If you have any questions about the item, please call Was Fujitani or me
at (209) 333-6706.
k. RM3nsko
I f Works director
JLR/lm
Enclosure
cc: City Clerk
CWATER51.N0C/TXTW.02M
Crry cbvisi at
DAMES W PINKER70N, Mayo
PHILLIP A PENNIND
MW Pro Tempos!
DMO M WNCHMAN
JACK A SIEGIACK
JOHN R WAndr) SNIDER
Ms. Maria E. Serna
801 West Elm Street
Lodi, CA 95240
CITY OF LODI
CITY HALL 221 WE9 PINE STREET
PDQ. 9M 3006
LORI. CALIFORNIA 95241-1910
12091 334-5634
FAIL M% 3134 nS
January 8, 1992
THOMU A. MER5ON
Cay M&UW
ALICE M. REVACHE
Cirf awk
>� MtNAij
GH Ar§wW
SUBJECF- Plans and Specifications and Advertisement for Bids for'
Demolition of Elevated Water Storage Tank, 114 North Main Street
Dear Ms. Serna:
Enclosed is a copy of background information on an item that will be
discussed at the City Council meeting on Wednesday. January 15. 1992. at
7:30 p.m. The meeting will be held in the City Council Chamber, Carnegie
Forum, 305 West Pine Street. Yca are welcome to attend.
If you wish to cmimnicate with the City Council, please contact Alice
Reimche, City Clerk, at (209) 333-6702.
If you have any questions about the
at (209) 333-6706.
,(Uoj
tk . Ronsks
If Works Director
JLR/1m
Enclosure
cc: City Clerk
CWATERST.NQC/TXTW.02M
item, please call Wes Fujitani or me