HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - January 15, 1992 (70)or
► G
CITY OF LOQ
Vr:NX T'I'TLE: Set Pubi rc• Hearing I , (Onsider Ndupt iota of AmPrrciitont Lu the Stmot
i"tinance aml S -i w al "s !or Grease lnLerl:f ptor Waste
IEWFTNc DATE: January 15, V14
OREPARED BY: Public,- Works Qj rector
0C'OMMENDED ACTION: That Lha City Council set a Public Hearing for February 5.
199)2 to discuss: the adoption fit an amendment to the sewer
ordinance and wei: we for grease interceptor waste.
BACKGROUND I&ORMA`I'iON: The City of l,ixli's wastewater treatment fac11 it has baer�
contacted by several Lonal grease hauler:; investigating (4
possibility of dumping coo lect.ed grease interceptor wasi.e
at the Ci ty of l,vdi's treatment fac 11 i Yy, These haulQcs havo been taking the grease
waste tv the City of Stockton and the County of Sacramento wastewater tre&MPP
f ar, i l i t lu:. These two Kaci 1 i t iew have recont ly stopped accept ing grease waste Wm
outside their service uveas -
The City of Laodi's wastewater treatment facility has not been designed to process
grease waste and thus would be required to contract with a local grease recycler to
handle any yrease accepted. The atLaahment (Mb ibit A) shows the estimated volumes
and costs the City would incur by accepting grease waste.
If the City is to provide this service a fee of ;0.25/gallon would have tO be
adopted. Additionally, the attached Amendment (Exhibit B) would have to be adopted
.in the Sewer Ordinance.
}.t should be pointed out that it tho local grease haulers were to truck this grease
waste directly to a recycling firm in Stockton they would only Pay x0.14/gallon for
disposal. One of the grease hauling firms indicated to City staff that in their
opinion (grease hauler) the recycling kicm in Stockton has a monopoly and it is
unfair to have such. It is For this reasojelhe grease haulers have nsked for our
consideration Lo accept grease. A
FVNDING : None
ac l.. Ron$ o
ubl c Works Director
J LR/FF/ Q
Prepared by Fran Fockas, Water/WaVewater Superintendent
cc: City Attorney
Watts/Wastewater Superintendent-
APPROVED!
uperintendent
APPROVED!
THOMAS A PETERSON �....«
0192WB.F ) Tapuary 8, 1992
EXHIBIT A
City Costs to Dispose (31 Grease Interceptor Waste
a Stockton firm which would park a tanker at White Movyh, chnrge;s $864.50 for
a full load which is 61"5 Viral Ions of grease. (The charge is the same whether
the tanker is full or not.) The firm also charges $57,00 per day demurrage for
any time over '1 days that the tanker is kept.
Estimate of grease volumes that might be generated and delivered to the White
Slough Water Pollution Control Facility:
0 Approximately 15 grease interceptors in the City Y 2 cleaning/year
x 1000 gal.;/twleaning = 2885 gal.sfweek - 52 weeks/year = 412
gals/day.
6115 gals/tanker - 412 gals/day � 15 days to Cili the tanker
o Disposal Costs
$864.50/tanker t 8 days demurrage x $57/&iy - 6115 gals/tanner
o Laboratory Costs (associated with required testing to assure grease
isn't contaminated with hazardous waste)
6 test at $228 ea. per every 10 tanker loads at 6175 gals/tanker
Xt $0.028I9a1
o Operations Costs (associated with receiving and permitting each
load)
Inspector time = 2.0 hour ($15.57/hr)/10 tankers = $0.000514a1
Operator time = 0.25 hour ($14.65/hr)/1000 ga16 $0.0037/gal
0 Overhead Costs (associated with billing)
49.12% x (Ing;pec, time $0.0005/gal + Op, time ;0.0037/gal)
= $0.002.1/gal
0 Total Cost
$0.214/gal t '0,028/gal + $0,0005/gal + $0.0031 } $0.0021
_ �0.248J9a1
If the city is to provide this service a fee of $0.25/gallon should be
collected to recover the City's cost.
0192WB.05 January 8, 1992
EXHIBIT B
AMENDMENT TO SEWER ORDINANCE
13,12 Grease Interceptor Waste
The charge for a discharge of grease interceptor waste shall be based on the
cost to the City of storage, transport, and recycling of the grease. A
discharger additionally accepts liability for all disposal costs of grease
interceptor waste which is found to be contaminated or in violation of any
city, state, or federal laws or regulations. A wastewater discharge permit is
required prior to any grease discharges. Charges will be those established and
adopted by the City Council from time to time by resolution.
019211B.05 January 8, 1992
CW CITY 01 LODE
('ARNF;(;IF: FORUM
.05 Wept Pine Street, I.odi
ITICE OF PUBLIC !-FEARING
Date-. February 5, 1992
Time: 7:30 p.m.
For information regarding this Pubtic Hearing
Please Contact:
Alice M. Reimche
Clty Clerk
Telephone: 333-6702
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE S HEREBY GIVEN that on WedmY nesday at the hour of 7 -0 p m . or as
soon thereafter as the matter may b, ', ,_,1 t t o it :ouncii will conduct a
public hearing to consider the following itiec
a) adoption of amudment to the Sewer Ordinance and setting rates
for grease interceptor waste
All interested persons are inviled to present their views and comments on this
matter. Written statements may be filed with the City Clerk at any time prior
to the hearing scheduled herein. and oral statements may be made at said
hearing.
If you challengethe subject matter in court, you may be limited to raisingonty
those issues you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing described in
this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk. 221 West
Pine Street. at or prior to the Public Hearing.
By Order Of the Lodi City Council:
Alice M. Reimche 17-}
City Clerk
Dated:
January 15, 1992
Ap�rovp.
aas t form
Bobby W. McNatt
City Attorney
CITY COUNCIL
FAMES W PINKERTON Mayor
PtitUIP A PENNtNO
Mayor Pro Ternprore
DAVID M HINCHMAN
LACK A SIEGL0CK
tOHN R (Randy) SNIDER
CITY OF LODI
CITY HALL, 221 WEST FWESTREEI
P.O.BOX 3006
LODI. CALIFORNIA 952.11-1910
(209) 334-5634
M I 1709! 5316795
January 23. 1992
California Department of Water Resources
Water Conservation Office, Room 804
P.O. Box 942836
Sacramento, CA 94236-0001
Gentlemen:
THOMAS A PETERSON
City Manager
At:-[ M. REIMCM
Coy Clerk
808 Rti NATT
City Attorney
This is to advise your office that following a public hearing at the
January 15, 1992 regular meeting of the Lodi City Council, the updated
Urban Water Managemer,t Plan and the Water Shortage Contingency Plan
were approved and adopted. There were a few minor additions prior to
approval concerning San Joaquin County groundwater and surface water
planning and policies in which Lodi is participating in some manner.
If you have any questions. please contact our office.
Very truly yours,
Alice M. Reimche
City Clerk
JMP
cc: Jack Ronsko, Public Works Director
Frank Beeler, Assistant Water/Wastewater superintendent