HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - February 20, 2008 Public CommentContinued February 20,2008
MOTION/VOTE:
The City Council, on motion of Council Member Johnson, Hansen second, approved the
removal of three trees at 1345 West Kettleman Lane in conjunction with Animal Shelter
arts project. The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Council Members —Hansen, Johnson, Katzakian, and Mayor Mounce
Noes: Council Members— Hitchcock
Absent: Council Members — None
E-18 "Adopt Resolution Authorizing Supplemental Funds from the Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Account Toward the Current Restroom Improvementsat HenryGlaves Park
and Beckman Park ($30,000)"
This item was pulled for further discussion by Council Member Hitchcock.
In response to Council Member Hitchcock, Mr. King stated Proposition 12 and Proposition
40 funds are both based on per capita allocations. He stated the nexus requirements are
met because the proposed project is an expansion project and will spend down money
from the funds as required.
Interim Parks and Recreation Director Steve Dutra provided an overview of the proposed
park restroom expansion project. In response to City Attorney Schwabauer, Mr. Dutra
stated the facilities are expanding in size by a minimum of one stall per facility.
Mr. Schwabauer stated that, while impact fees cannot be used for existing improvements,
they can be used for expansion projects and he is comfortable with the recommended
action.
MOTION/VOTE:
The City Council, on motion Council Member Hitchcock, Katzakian second, unanimously
adopted Resolution No. 2008-28 authorizing supplemental funds from the Parks and
Recreation Impact Fee Account toward the current restroom improvements at Henry
Glaves Park and Beckman Park in the amount of $30,000.
F. COMMENTS BYTHE PUBLIC ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS
• Rebecca Wallace, Wal-Mart Store Manager, presented the World of Wonders Science
Museum with a donation of $25,000.
• Frank Beeler provided an overview of the Salmonid Restoration Conference to be held at
Hutchins Street Square on March 5-8, 2008, and invited everyone to attend.
G. COMMENTS BY CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS
• Council Member Johnson stated the City Council has not received a salary adjustment in 18
years and requested the matter be placed on a future agenda.
• Mayor Pro Tempore Hansen reported on his attendance at two commission meetings and an
Executive San Joaquin Council of Governments' meeting. He specifically discussed the Smart
Growth fund, Law and Legislative Committee agenda, California climate control, AB 32, and
greenhouse gas emission concerns.
H. COMMENTS BYTHE CITY MANAGER ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS
City Manager King reported that the City recently received two San Joaquin Awards for
Excellence related to the wine industry.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.
S
A PRODUCTION OF Thi
_. SOUTH YUBA RIVER CITIZENS LEAGUE
Rita
......................................................... by Alison Blehert-Koehn
Tales of the San Joaquin
............................................................ by Christopher Beaver
Oil and Water Project
...............................................................r...... by Seth Warren
The Edge of Eden:
Living with Grizzlies
............................................................... by Jeff& Sue Turner
125 S. Hutchins Street, Lodi, CA
$12, $8 for students and seniors. Advance tickets can be purchased at Sierra Adventure Outfitters
120 N. School Street Lodi. CA 95240, or at the door
WH&E ,' I MICHM,'-4iDAV ID
BRIGHTER
Ki R 13 LQ=MMr1 PLANET
For more info, please call Salmonid Restoration Federation at (707) 923-7501 or visit www.calsalmon.org
March 5-8,.2008
Lodi, CA
Wednesday, March 5
zi.
Workshop `1: Fins and Zins
Workshop and Field Tour Coordinator. Kent Reeves, Yoto County
De;�arl:nerit cit Parks Natoril Resources
The classroom portion of the workshop will address the
challenges of sustainable agriculture with an emphasis
on winegrowing in the Lodi Region.
Biodiversity and Agriculture, Jo Ann Baumgartner, Wild Farm
�3lliai;ci?
Developing Hedgerows for Biodiversity, Sam Earnshaw,c oinnrunity
Alhanoe with Family Farmers
Implementing Sustainable Winegrape Crowing in San Joaquin County,
Cliff Ohmart, Research Direclor, I,0di-11 oodlrridge.
iEtei rape C clmrnissiorr
Monitoring Biodiversity in a Working .andscape, Kent Reeves, Yolo
Comity Department of Parks & Natural Resources
Workshop 2: Non-native Invasive Species—Preventing,
Detecting, Monitoring, and Managing
Coordinators: Kim Webb and Louanne McMartin, I TS Fisll &
w'kd!ife Service
The workshop will highlight practical information
on control, prevention, and eradication of non-native
invasive species (NIS), NIS management tools, resource
materials to improve effectiveness in the field, training
of Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP)
planning for natural resource management, as well as
to provide networking opportunities with practitioners,
researchers and government officials.
Environmental Compliance Process for Conservation Projects, Ajay
Singh, Stony C- -reef: Watershed t.00rctinatortConservation
ITUIn<'z, C=1.e1.111 COUrity Resource C 'Msetvation District
Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) as a Planning Tool that
Identifies and Evaluates Potential Rtsks for Introducing Invasive
Species, Jonathan Thompson, US Fish & %Vitdlile Service
Troubled Waters: Biological Invasion of Our Water Systems, Kim
Webb, Project Leader. US Fish c�: Wildlife Service
Guidance on Minimizing Spread of Aquatic Invasive Species When
Implementing Fish Passage Projects, Dave Hu, Habitat
Re,toratiou Coordinator, t. -I'S Fish Wildlife Service
Successful Techniques for Removing and Controlling Invasive Species,
Dan Efseaff, Restoration Ecologist and Christiana Conser,
Rt°,iorai.ion Biologist River Parlrw.rs
r; Lti:i _ crag t
Fins and Zins Afternoon Field Tour:
Following the morning classroom session we will visit
three vineyards and a walnut orchard where riparian
restoration, Integrated Pest Management, hedgerow
planting for insectaries, and other sustainable practices
will be viewed and discussed. The day will end at the
Participants will visit Knight's Ferry on the Stanislaus River
that is in the beginning stages o f aside channel
andfloodplain restoration project.
photo: courtesy of Cramer Fish Sciences
Lodi Wine and Visitor's Center with wine tasting from
Lodi vineyards that are implementing land management
that benefits fish and wildlife, and are certified through
the LODI Rules! for Sustainable Winegrowing Program.
Stanislaus River Tour
Coordinators:JDWikert and CarlMesick, .Anadromous Fisheries
Restoration Program, US Fish & Wildlife Service; Tim Heyne,
Jason Guignard, and Fred Jurick, CAA Dept. of Fish & Game;
and Jesse Anderson, Cramer Fish Sciences
This tour will visit restoration and monitoring sites
on the Stanislaus River including the Lover's Leap site
which created 25 riffles and used large boulders and
woody debris to create habitat and side -channel habitat
and a lower floodplain bench. Participants will see the
Knight's Ferry site to view ongoing gravelrestoration and
the potential floodplain restoration project and discuss
the basin temperature monitoring/modeling project,
escapement surveys, habitat modeling and the weir.
Thursday, March 6
Fish Passage and Protection Workshop
Coordinators: Mike Love, Mike Love. & Associates and Steve
Allen, winzler & Kelly
In this workshop speakers will present fish passage and
protection projects on rivers and larger streams. The
workshop will conclude with hands-on instruction using
the newest version of the FishXing software.
Evaluating Suitability of Fish Passage Design Alternatives for the BART
Weir. Alameda Creek, Kozmo Ken Bates, private consultant
Developing Fish Resting Pools for a Concrete Flood Control Channel on
Corte Madero Creek, Marin County, Michael Love, Michael
Love & Associates
continued on page 9
Page 6 Salmonid Restoration Federation
c�d"� pc -" [Lt�e
xos
Individual Registration Form (PLEASE USE ONE FORM PER PERSON)
• Advanced Registration Must Be Postmarked By February 15, 2008 •
Name: Phone (work):
Address: (home):
email:
Affiliation:
Wednesday, March 5, 2008
1. Fins and Zins Workshop and Tour
2. Non -Native Invasive Species Workshop
3. Habitat Restorationand Monitoring Projects
on the Stanislaus River
4. City of Lodi Watershed Education Tour (5:15-6:30pm)
Thursday, March 6,2008
5. Fisheries Monitoring and Management Programs
on the Mokelumne River
6. Fish Passage Workshop
7. Restoring Seasonal Floodplains Workshop
and Cosumnes River Preserve Tour
Please check box if you are a presenter
Advance
Late
Registration
Registration FEE
$50
$60
$50
$60
$50
$60
$15
$20
$50
$60
$50
$60
$50
$60
8. Tuolumne River Restoration Tour $50 $60
* Fieldtcurs includea bagged lunch and transportation. Please wear clothing, raingear and shoes appropriatefor field tours_
!�(i cFotGti `� rc C .uc tc• "e taac $10 $12
March 7-8, 2008 (includes Friday and Saturday lunch and a copy of the Proceedings)
SRF Member (individual membership only) $110 $140
Non-member $160 $190
Student (with photocopy of student ID) $70 $80
`�ctt vvr ��cr�ueE
(Preference: Salmon Chicken Vegetarian) $30 $30
��% �iva ,Cifvc,3 Guy
O New O Renewal
Individual Memberships: 0$25 Alevin 0$50 Fry 0$100 Smolt 0$250 Jack0$500 Spawner
Payment Total
Method of Payment O Check 0 Money Order O Purchase Order
Purchase Orders will only be accepted for 5 or more people registering. Each registrantwill need to fill out an individual form.
0 VISAO MasterCard Credit Card # Exp. Date
Fins and Zins
A !Xoo shop and Field Trip in Sustainable Agriculture and Riparian Management
Livestock and winegrape production
are two of the largest agricultural land
uses in California and encompass over
38.5 million acres combined. These
two forms of agriculture production
have been an important component of
California's economic and social fabric
since the establishment of the first
Spanish mission in San Diego in the
late 1700's. Combined, livestock and
winegrape production contribute over
$50 billion annually to California's
economy. Walnuts were also introduced
by the Spanish in the early 1800's.The
"mission" walnuts were similar to the
native California walnuts that were very
small with ahard shell. The introduction
of the "English" or "Persian" walnut
in the mid -1800s helped to expand
walnut farming began to expand in the
state. Today, California produces 99%
of the walnuts in the United States,
and most of that production is centered
in San Joaquin County. Resource
management professionals recognize
the role of sustainable agriculture
in the conservation of fish and
wildlife. Therefore, understanding the
sustainable management of livestock,
winegrape, and walnut production can
contribute to an overall benefit for fish
and wildlife influenced by these three
forms of agriculture.
Implementation of Sustainable
Winegrape Growing in SanJoaquin
County, California
California is one of the world's
leading grape producers, accounting for
90 percent of U S. production and more
than nine percent of global output—
fourth
utputfourth largest after France, Italy, and
Spain. Winegrapes are grown in 46
of California's 58 counties covering
513,000 acres and rank among the
state's top 10 agricultural products.
Within the agriculture industry,
California winegrape growers are
considered leaders in the sustainable
farming arena. However, how does one
implement sustainable farming in their
own vineyard? The classroom portion
of the workshop will address the
challenges of sustainable winegrowing,
which are: 1)Defining sustainability; 2)
Implementing sustainable winegrowing
practices in the vineyard; 3) Measuring
progress at the individual vineyard
level; and 4) Certifying growers who
Fish Passage and Protection
on Flow -Regulated Rivers and Streams
Mike Loge explained the engineering concepts behind
the design ofthis bridge for fish passage during the SRF
fish passage field schools this fall.
photo Dana Stolzman
Providing upstream fish passage and
downstream fish protection on flow -
regulated rivers and streams is technically
challenging. For upstream passage
various types of fishways are often used,
and screening of water diversions is a
common means of protecting juvenile
salmonids from injury, stranding, and
predation as they migrate downstream.
Both fishways and fish screens are
based on a hydraulic design approach,
which must consider the hydraulic
environment, sediment and debris
loading, the swimming abilities and
behavioral characteristics of the target
fish, and the potential for increasing
predation or poaching opportunities.
Additionally, site and cost constraints
frequently make it infeasible to satisfy
all existing design criteria over the entire
design flow range. In these conditions
meet specific standards under the
LODI Rules! Certification Program.
Examples of sustainable winegrape
growing adjacent to riparian areas will
he discussed.
Participants to the Fin, and Zins tour will ; isit
vineyards that are utilizing sustainable practices in
their agricultural methods.
photo: Dale Goff
the objective often becomes one of
maximizing the range of flows so that
passage or protection can he provided.
With all of these considerations, there
is a substantial amount of uncertainty
concerning the anticipated performance
of a particular fish passage or protection
project once it is constructed. Given
that these types of projects are generally
costly to implement, it is critical that we
examine and learn from previous projects
to maximize the potential for success.
In this session speakers will present
recently completed fish passage and
protection projects on rivers and larger
streams, with a focus on project design,
implementation, and lessons learned.
Presentations will also emphasize the
various elements that were, or should
have been, considered in the project
design phases.
Page 8 Salmonid Restoration Federation
Trainin Worksho S &Field Tours, continued from�a�e 6
Hydraulic Modeling and Evaluation of Fish Passage at Rode Vortex
Weirs, Denis Ruttenberg, Prunuske Chatham, Inc
Design and Maintenance Considerations of Various Fish Screening
Methodologies—A Historical Perspective, David Nichols,
Northwtst EnvironmentaL Services
fish Screen Design Examples of Several Installed Diversion Structures,
Mark Wharry, SICK Consulting Digineers/Winiler & Kelly
fish Passage and Screening Design Interplay, Hydraulic Design
Challenges of Irrigation District Diversions, Steven Allen,
tLir»it, fi Kens
Afternoon Training: Using the FishXing 3.0 Software to Design Stream
Crossings for Fish Passage: Note, If possible, bring a lap -top
loaded witli the sottware
Restoring Seasonal Floodplains of the Central Valley
Coordinator. Joshua Viers, Departinenl of Environmental
Science & Policy, UC Davis
In the workshop we will use the experimental restoration
of the Cosumnes River floodplain to examine watershed
dynamics and modeling, geomorphic response to levee
breaches, primary production in seasonal flooding
regimes, salmonid reproduction on floodplains, and
riparian vegetation dynamics.
Watershed Dynamics and Modeling, Larry Rodriguez, Robertson -
Bryan, Inc.
Geomorphic Response to Levee Breaches, Jeff Mount, UC Davis
Salmonid Reproduction on Floodplains, Carson Jeffres, UC Davis
Center for Watershed Sciences
Riparian Vegetation Dynamics, Joshua Viers, Department of
Eiv, ironnrental Science & Policy, UC: Davis
Primary Production in Seasonal Flooding Regimes, Ed Grosholz,
Cooperative F.xbonsion, UC Davis
Hydrologic, Geornorphic, and Ecological Tools for Setback Floodplain
Design: Lessons learned on the Bear Riverand Feather River Levee
Setback Projects, Eric Ginney, Philip Williams & Associates,
Ltd.
Afternoon Tour of the Cosumnes River Preserve
Field Tour Ieaders:Joshua Viers and Ed Grosholz, UC Davis
This tour will be accompanied by botanists and birders
for a multidisciplinary excursiori in which field tour
participants will examine sites of experimental levee
breaches, seasonal floodplains, and restored riparian
forests located at the Cosumnes River Preserve.
Cosumnes River PreserveArea during a flood in 2005.
photo'coortesy Robertson -Bryan, Inc.
lie SRFConference will feature an all -day feeld tour of monitoring and restoration
projects on the Mohelumne River as well as a concurrent session focussing on
restoration, monitoring, and management ofa regulated river.
photo: Michelte Workman
Thursday, March 6
Restoration on the Tuolumne River:
Looking Back on Implementation and Assessment
and looking Forward to Future Restoration Efforts
Tour leaders: ScottMcBain, McBairL & Trush, hrc.; Carl Mesick,
AnadrotIIOW Fish Restoration Program US Fish & Wildlife
Service; Tim Heyne, CA Dept. of Fish & Game; Wilton
Fryer, Turlock Irrigation District; Patrick Koepele, Tuolumne
River Preservation Trust; arid Dave Boucher, Friends of the
Tuolumne.
This field tour will provide an overview of the restoration
strategies on the three major tributaries to the lower
San Joaquin River, how these strategies have influenced
Chinook salmon population trends, and examine
potential limiting factors to salmon production. The
tour will visit several restoration sites where specifics CC
restoration approach, design, and effectiveness will be
discussed as a group. The field tour will conclude with
a group discussion of new restoration strategies for the
future, and will complement a similar field tour of the
Stanislaus River to be conducted on the previous day.
Fisheries Monitoring and Management Programs
on the Mokelumne River
Field Tour Coordinator. Michelle Workman, Fast Ray Municipal
Utility District
Tour leaders: Steve Boyd, Michelle Workman, James Smith,
and Steve Pagliughi, East Bay Municipal Utility District: Bob
Anderson, CA Dept of Fish & Game; Gregory Pasternack,
UC Davis; and David Hu, Anadromous Fisheries Restoration
Program, US Fish & Wildlite Service
Participants will visit the hatchery facility and see
how hatchery production plays a role in regulated
river management, a gravel restoration site aimed at
increasing spawning habitat and floodplain inundation
potential, two engineered side channels designed to
provide juvenile rearing habitat, and a juvenile migration
monitoring stationanddiscussvarious aspects of fisheries
monitoring on the river.
Winter 2006/7 Page 9
Friday, March 7
Plenary Moderator: Seth Zuckerman, editor of Salmon Nation
Watershed Bills and Watershed Moments in the California State
Legislature, Jared Huffman, California State Assembly
Member
Salmon in 2100: Some Recovery Strategies that lust Might Work,
Robert Lackey, US Environmental Protection Agency
Living in Interesting Times: New Challenges for Salmon in the Delta,
Christina Swanson, Senior Scientist, rhe Ray Institute
Springing Back Chinook Salmon and Other Native Fishes to the San
Joaquin, Peter Moyle, Fisheries liioiogist, [ C Davis and
author othilrand Fishes
r 'rLc�.[ic� _"�i�t'C[GVtFt. �.t;flLLal('LE%tti- L�rj..72�fz:i
Recovery Planning Models
Session Chair: Diane Windham, Central Valley Recovery
Coordinator, NOAA Fisheries
NMFS Central Valley Solmonid Recovery Planning Efforts, Diane
Windham, Central Valley Recovery Coordinator, NOAA
Fisheries
Planning forRecoveryof CentralCalifornia Coast Salmonids, Charlotte
Ambrose, Central Coast Recovery Coordinator, National
Marine Fisheries Seri ice
A Basic Strategy for Steelhead Recovery in South -Central and Southern
California, Mark H. Capelli, South-Cantral/Southern
C alifornia Steelliead Recovery Coordinator, National
Marine Fisheries Service
Informing Recovery Planning: Habitat Modeling for Coho Salmon,
Chinook Salmon and Steelhead in California and Southern
Oregon, Ethan Mora, NOAA Fisheries and UC Santa Cruz
Assimilating and Rating Existing Aquatic Habitat and Upland Data to
Support Recovery Planning of ES4 listed Salmon and Steelhead,
Patrick Higgins, Klamath River Information System
Participation in Hydro Relicensing as a Tool for Furthering NOAA
Fisheries Mission, Steve Edmondson, NOAA Fisheries,
Ilahitat C onservation Division
Dam Removal and Modifications for Salmonid Recovery
Session Coordinator: Matt Stoecker, Beyond Searsville Dam and
Stoecker Ecological
Dam Removals Large and Small, How Best to Leam from them All?,
Marcia Whitman, Ctrl Dept. of Fish & Gaine
The Very Hungry River. Spectacular CeomorphicResponse of the Sandy
River to Removal of Marmot Dam, Gordon Grant, USDA Forest
Ser%ice. Pacific Northwest Researcti Statiurr
Matilija Dam: Implications of Dam Removal on Floodploin and
Watershed Management, Paul Jenkin, Ventura County
Chapter of the Surfrider Foundation & Matilija Coalition
Klamath River- Dam Removal and FERC Relicensing, Steve Rothert,
American Rivery
Removing Searsville Dam—Stonford University's Unique Ecosystem
Restoration Opportunity, Matt Stoecker, Beyond Searsville
Dam and Stoecker Ecological
The Promising Role of Dam Reoperation and Dom Removal in the
Restoration of Salmonids in the Son Francisco Bay -Delta and
Central Valley Watersheds, Ann Hayden, Environmental
Defense
Central Valley Chinook, Steelhead, and Trout
Session Coordinators: Cindy Charles, Golden West Women
Flyftshers and Rob Dickerson, Trout Unlimited
Restoring Rangeland Watersheds & Freshwater fisheries: Pine Creek
Watershed& Eagle Lake Rainbow Trout, Lisa C. Thompson,
Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology Department, UC
Davis
Ancestry and Origins of Oncorhynchus mykiss, Steelhead/Rainbow
Trout in the Central Valley Inferred from Population Genetic
Analysis, J. Carlos Garza, Southwest Fisheries SciericcCenter,
NOAA Fisheries
Factors Influencing Chinook Salmon Productionon the Lower Tuolumne,
Dean Marston and TimHeyne, CA Dept. of Fish & Game
Yuba Rn-er Salmon: Status and Challenges, Gary Reedy, South Yub a
River Citizens League
Butte Creek Salmon and Steelhead Restoration—Can Salmonid
Restoration and Hydroelectric Operations Coexist? Allen
Harthorn, Friends cf Rutte Creek
The Sacramento Rivas Ecological Flows Tool (SacEFT): A Tool for
Evaluating WaterManagement OperationsEffects on Sacramento
F &Fish Populations, Ryan Luster, Sacramento Riveri'roject.
The Nature Conservancy
Saturday March 8
Hydrology, Native Salmon, and Ceomorphology: Insights to
Rehabilitatingthe San Joaquin River
Session Coordinators: Scott McBain, McBain and IYush and Eric
Ginney, Philip Williams& Associates, Ltd.
Overview of Hydrology and Geomarphologyof the San Joaquin RAW,
ScottMcBain, McBain andTrush
Groundwater and Surface Water Interactions Along the Son Joaquin
River, Peter Vorster, The Bay Institute
Bed Mobility Thresholds and Flow Regimes to Restore Salmon on the
Son Joaquin River; Matt Kondolf, UC Berkeley
Matching Solmonid Life History Strategies to a Restored San Joaquin
River, Mike Fainter, Ecosystem Restoration Sciences arid
Frank Ligon, Stillwater Sciences
Integrating Restoration with Flood Management Improvements on
the San Joaquin River Paula Landis, CA Dept. of Water
Resources
Page 10 SolmonidRestomdonFederotion
EngagingWatershed Communities in Salmonid Restoration
Session Chair. Jeff Martinez, South Yuba River Citizens League
Development and Implementation of Floodplain Restoration Projects
Benefiting Salmonids and Terrestrial Wildlife Species Stacy L.
Small, Riyer Partners -San Soazluin Valley Project
Becoming Stewards of the Land Kb Lim On, Derek Hitchcock and
Jeff Martinez, South Yugo River Citizens League
Redefining the Community, Sharon Weaver, San Joaquin River
Par kwav and Conservation Trust
California Conservation Corps—Califomia's Future Restoration
Workers, Allan Renger, CA Dept of Fish tic Game; Leah
Mahan, National Marirne Fisheries Service; John Griffith,
Caiitornia Conservation Corps
Implementationof the Lower Mokelumne River- Watershed Stewardship
Plan: Lessons in Collaboration, John Brodie, San Joaquin
C()unl� Kesource Conservation District & East Ray
10unicipal UtilitNI District and Richard Leong, East Ray
Municipal Utility District
Basins of Relations, Brock Dolman, Occidental Arts t� Ecology
Center
Friant Dam on the
San,Joaquin River
photo NRDC
Monitoring, Restoration,
and Management in the Central Valley
Session Chair: Jesse Anderson, Cramer Fish Sciences
2007 Merced RiverJuvenile Salmonid Out -migration Monitoring, John
Montgomery, Cratuer Fish Sciences
Juvenile Chinook Salmon Out -migrant Abundance Estimates in the
LowerStanislaus River, Clark Watry, C tamQr Fish Sciences
Comprehensive Assessment and Monitoring Program (CAMP) for
AnodromousFish, Doug Threloff, US Fish & Wildlife Service-
CAMP
ervice-
C:Aill'
Evaluating Success of Restoring Ecosystems Using a Bioenergetics
Model, Ayesha Gray, Cramer Fish Sciences
Flood Corridor Restoration Improves Anodromous Fish Migratory
Habitat at the Big Bend Project Along the Tuolumne River,
California, Patrick Koepele, TUO]Umne River Trust
Envisioning Futures for Habitat Restoration and Salmon Protection in
the Delta, Christina Swanson, The BaN� liotitute
`.`• �ar,TG{c<:�! .�,,f.i2%1.1'Li:U�v (v4ur-i;;'tr,2�lc;c2!- `�t_4.Scus11
San Joaquin River Restoration: the Rebirth of a River
Session Chair. Zoltan Matica, CA Dept. of Watt -r Resources
Genetic Issues for the Reintroduction of Native Fishes on the Son
Joaquin River, Josh Israel, Department of Animal Science
and Center for Watershed Sciences, I IC Davis
Toxicological Considerations in the Restoration of .San Joaquin River
Solmonids, Abirnael Leon Cardona, .San Joaquin District,
CA Dept. A Water Resources
Bringing Native (and other) Fishes Bode to the Son Joaquin, Peter B.
Moyle, Center for Waterslred Sciences and Department of
V�ildlife, Fish and C:�rnservatiori Biology, L"C Davis
Blueprint for Rher Restoration: a Summary of the San Joaquin River
Settlement Agreement, Monty Schmitt, Natural Resources
Defense Council
AgencyApproaches to theSon Joaquin River RestorationProgram, Jason
Philips, LJ5 Bureau of RecWnation and Dan Castleberry,
US Fish & Wildlife Service.
Fisheries Management Planning Approach, Jeff McLain, US Fish
Wildlife Service
Managing a Regulated River: Restoration, Monitoring and
Management on the Mokelumne River
Session Coordinator. Michelle Workman, East Bay Nluuicipal
Utility District
Management implicationsofMokelumneR wSalmon Origin (Hatchery
versus Wild), J.D.Wikert, Anadromous Fish Restoration
Program, US Fish & Wildlife Service
Evaluation of a Volitional Release Strategy for Hatchery -produced
Central Valley Chinook Salmon in The Lower Mokelumne River,
California, Michelle L. Workman, East Ray Municipal
Utility District
Evaluation of a Volitional Release Strategy for Hatchery -produced
Central Valley Steelhead in The Lower Mokelumne River,
California, Joseph h.. Merz, Cramer Fish Sciences
Ceomorphic and Ecological Interactions of Large Wood and Pacific
Salmonid Reads Across Habitat Units in the Mokelumne River,
Anne Senter, Department of Land, Air, Water Resources,
EJC Davis
The Effects of Engineered Side Channel Habitat on Macroinvertebrate
and Fish Populations in the Mokelumne River, Walter Heady,
LIC Santa Crur
Using GIS in Salmonid Spawning Surveys. A Valuable Tool for
Designing Projects and Measuring Success, Jose Setka, East Bay
Municipal Utility District
Restoring Natural Hydrographs
Session Coordinator. Gregory B. Pasternack, Department of
Land, Air, and Water Resources, UC Davis
Engineered Channel ControlsAre More Limiting Than Flow Regime Fix
Rehabilitating Many Of California's Regulated Rivers, Gregory
B. Pasternack, Department of Land, Air, and Water
Resources. UC Davis
System -Wide Analysis of the Potential to Restore Environmental Flows
and Augment Water Supplies in the Central Valley Tributaries
through Reservoir Reoperation and Fluvial Process Restoration,
Gregory A. Thomas, Natural Heritage Institute
Changes in River Ecological Functionality Due to Floods and Gravel
in Two Regulated Central Valley River, Marisa 1. Escobar,
Department of Land, Air, and Water Resources, IJC Davis
Can Gravel Augmentation Below Dams Mitigate Thermal Effects of
Reservoirs? Gordon E. Grant, USDA Forest Service, Pacific
Northwest Research Station
Improving the Understanding ofSedimen t Pulse 1 mpacts on Downstream
Biological Processes, Scott Dusterhoff, Stillwater Sciences
&t,4at4
nquet
6 00pm Wild Salmon Banquet
700pmAwards & Cabaret
8 30pm Dance with Somboda
Winter200617 Page 11