The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Report - November 15, 2006 E-10AGENDA ITEM E4W 10 Aft CITY OF LODI IV COUNICIL COMMUNICATION TM AGENDA TITLE: Adoptt Resolution Authorizing City Manager to File Clabn far 2001107 Tranortation Development Act (TDA) Funds in the Amount of $3,534,183 from Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and $40,785 from State transit Assistance (STA) MEETIOG DATE: November 15, 2006 PREPARED BY: Public Works Director RECOIiME ACTION: Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to file the attached claim for the 2006107 Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds in the amount of $3,536,183 from the Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and $40,785 from State Transit Assistance (STA). BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Each year, the City of Lodi receives an apportionment of TDA funds to support Lodi's transit and pedestrian/bicycle programs. These are State transportation funds that are primarily for non -vehicular transportation but can be used on roads if transit needs are being met. They are channeled through the Council, of Governments, our regional transportation planning agency. The total, claim for fiscal year 2006107, including pedestrian/bike funds, is $3,536,183 from the LTF and $40,785 from STA. A deduction of 3% will be made for San Joaquin Council of Governments (COG) planning. The LTF amount includes unspent prior year allocations, so the net new funds to the City total approximately $2.4 million. A more detailed breakdown of the amounts is shown on pages 8 and 9 of the attached claim. The City Council should be aware that our transit operations, Dial -A -Ride and GrapeLine, are fully funded from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), State TDA, and other competitive sources of funds. Transit operations are not dependent on any General Fund support. We intend to continue to use TDA funds for transit, pedestrian, and bicycle -related projects and maintenance as much as possible. FISCAL tMPACT: The continued receipt of TDA funding for FY 2006107 will pay for on-going Transit operations and upcoming capital needs without any General Fund support. FUNDINI3 AVAILABLE: None required. Prepared by Tiffani M. Fink, Transportation Manager RCP/TMF/pmf Attachment cc: Finaincial Service Manager Richard C. Prima, Jr. Public Works Director City Engineer/Deputy Public Works Director APPROVED: Blair King, anger J:ITRANSMTDAGLAIM%C2006TDACIaim.doc 11/9/2006 FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007 SAN JOAQUIN COG TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT AC1 CLAIM FORMS AND GUIDELINES FOR STATE TRANSIT ASSITANCE FUND (STA AND LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND (LTF; LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND NON -TRANSIT CLAIM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006/07 TO: San Joaquin Council of Governments 555 E Weber Avenue Stockton, CA 95202 FROM: Applicant: City of Lodi Address: 221 West Pine Street City Lodi, CA Contact Person: Tiffani M. Fink E-mail Address: tfink(cDiodi.aov Zip 95240 Phone: (209) 333-6800 ext 2678 Fax: (209) 333-6710 The City of Lodi hereby requests, in accordance with Chapter 1400 Statutes 1971 and applicable rules and regulations, that its annual transportation claim be approved in the amount of $3,536,183 for fiscal year 2006/07, to be drawn from the Local Transportation Fund. When approved, please transmit this claim to the County Auditor for payment. Approval of the claim and payment by the County Auditor to this applicant is subject to such monies being on hand and available for distribution, and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved annual financial plan. The claimant certifies that this Local Transportation Fund claim and the financial information contained therein is reasonable and accurate to the best of my knowledge and the aforementioned information indicates the eligibility of this claimant for funds for the fiscal year of the application pursuant to CAC Section 6634 and 6734 Submitted by: Title: City Manager Date: San Joaquin Council of Governements Date of approval. BY. Date: Applicant: Andrew T. Chesley Executive Director SJCOG Approving Authority 6 STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE CLAIM LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND CLAIM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006/07 TO: San Joaquin Council of Governments 555 E Weber Avenue Stockton, CA 95202 FROM: Applicant: City of Lodi Address: 221 West Pine Street City Lodi, CA Zip: 95240 Contact Person: Tiffany M. Fink Phone: (209) 333-6800 ext 2678 E-mail Address: tfink(@Iodi.gov Fax: (209) 333-6710 The City of Lodi quailfied pursuant to Sections 99313.6, 99314.5 and 99314.6 of the Public Utilities Code, hereby requests, in accordance with Chapter 1400, Statutes of 1971 as amended and applicalcable rules and regulations, that an allocation be made in the amount of $40,785 for fiscal year FY 06/07 to be drawn from the State Transit Assistance trust fund of San Joaquin County Allocation instructions and paymnet by the County Auditor to this claimant are subject to such monies being on hand and available for distribution, and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved claim. The claimant certifies that this State Transit Assistance Fund claim and the financial information contained therein is reasonable and accurate to the best of my knowledge and that the aforemetnioned information indicates the eligibility of this claimant for funds for the fiscal year of the application pursuant to CAC Section 634 and 6734. Submitted by: Title: City Manager Date: San Joaquin Council of Governements Date of approval: BY: Date: Applicant: Andrew T. Chesley Executive Director SJCOG Approving Authority 7 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT APPORTIONMENTS I Local Transportation Fund Available Apportionment A. Area Apportionment 2006-2007 B. Pedestrian/Bicycle Apportionment C. Previous Years' Unclaimed Apportionment D. Unexpended Carryover E 3% for COG Transit Planning F. Total Available for 2006-2007 Claim(s) G Less any LTF Already Claimed 2006-2007 H. TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR THIS CLAIM (Also enter on page 9, 1 st column) I. Actual net funds available (H -D -E=1) II State Transit Assistance Fund Available Apportionment A. Area Apportionment 2006-2007 B. Special Operator Apportionment 2006-2007 C. Previous Years' Unclaimed Apportionment D. Unexpended Carryover E. 2% of A. Claimed on Behalf of COG for Tran: Planning F. Total Available for 2006-2007 Claims G. Less any STA Already Claimed in 2006-2007 H. TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR THIS CLAIM (Also enter on page 9, 1 st column) I. Actual net funds available (H -D -E=1) a $ 2,301,878 $ 50,350 $ 141,527 $ 1,110,672 $ 73,283 $ 3,677,710 $ 0 $ 3,677,710 $ 2,493,755 $ 0 $ 38,244 $ 2,541 $ 0 $ 0 $ 40,785 $ 0 $ 40.785 $ 40,785 CLAIM PURPOSES I. LTF II STA I. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Article 4 (99260) - Operator $ CCR Section 6730(a) Public Transit $ 40,785 Article 8 (99400(c)) Contractor Operating $ 1,736,989 Article 8 (99400(e)) Contractor Capital $ 1,210,111 Article 8 (99400(b)) Passenger Rail Service Operations and Capital $ TDA Administraion $ 73,283 II PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE Article 3 (99234) $ 121,934 III ROADS AND STREETS Article 8 (99400(a)) $ 393,866 IV OTHER Article 8 (99400(b,c,d,e)) $ 0 TOTAL THIS CLAIM $ 3,536,183 40,785 TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR THIS CLAIM (from pg. 8, (I.) H and (II.) H) $ 3,677,710 40,785 UNCLAIMED APPORTIONMENT (TOTAL AVAILABLE less TOTAL THIS CLAIM) $ 141,527 (0) IMPORTANT: To avoid accidental overpayment, please identify and itemize in the space below any unexpeded carryover included in the amounts being claimed above. Identify the amount of carryover and the purpose for which it is being reclaimed. Attach pages as necessary. LTF in Transit Fund to be reclaimed for Contract Operations 204,181.37 LTF in Streets and Roads Fund to be reclaimed for Streets & Roads 243,865.76 LTF in Ped/Bike Fund reclaimed for Peds/Bicycle 71,583.77 LTF in Transit Fund reclaimed for Capital 591,041.01 TOTAL UNEXPENDED CARRYOVER 1,110,671.91 PART I - PUBLIC TRANSPORTION FINANCIAL INFORMATION Please Circle Either Please Circle Either Article 4 Operator 2005/2006 rticle 8 Contractor 2006/2007 Operators claiming STA funds must meet the qualifying criteria (PUC Section 99314.6) p17 of this form E I. OPERATING REVENUES 401 Passenger Fares 402 Special Transit Fares 405 Charter Revenues 406 Auxiliary Transportation Revenues (includes advertising) 407 Non -Transportation Revenues 408 Tax Revenue (Specify) Property Tax Sales Tax (not TDA) 409 Local Grants and Reimbursements Purchase of Service Local Transportation Fund (LTF revenue) 410 Local Special Fare Assistance 411 State Cash Grants & Reimbursement CMAQ Other STA 412 State Special Fare Assistance 413 Federal Grants and Reimbursements FTA Grants 5307 430 Contriubted Services (Not Cash) 440 Subsidy from other Sector of Operations Interest Income TOTAL I. CAPITAL REVENUES 464 Capital Grants and Subsides Specify Federal, State, Local: FTA Section 5307 State Transit Assistance (STA) Local Transportation Fund (LTF) Non -Governmental Donations TOTAL 10 FY05/06 FY06/07 ESTIMATE BUDGET ACTUAL 386,322 421,000 81,025 89,200 I,VL I,V IV 1,/ VV,JV�J 1 I,V IT VV,LLZ 992,000 697,194 1$2,992,7791 1 $2,982,607 161,352 502,806 66,291 1,210,111 $227,643 $1,712,917 III. OPERATING EXPENSES FY05/06 FY06/07 ESTIMATE BUDGET ACTUAL 501 Labor Operations and Salaries/Wages Other Salaries/Wages 74,428 77,864 502 Fringe Benefits 29,622 39,204 503 Services 466,480 502,284 504 Materials/Supplies 173,728 90,000 Fuel/Lubricants Tires/Tubes Other 17,285 505 Utilites 46,796 33,155 506 Casualty/Liability Costs 55,487 120,000 507 Taxes 21,743 508 Purchased Transportation Service 1,586,766 1,800,000 509 Misc Expenses 110,322 320,100 510 Expense Transfer 511 Interest Expense 512 Leases and Rentals 513 Depreciation/amortization Operator Funds Grant Funds TOTAL 1$2,582,657 $2,982,607 IV. CAPITAL EXPENSES Debt Service Land/Property Acquistion Vehicles 1,168,086 Construction 227,643 544,831 Other TOTAL $227,643 $1,712,917 * Allowable capital expenses are limited for Article 8 Claimants; see 99400(e) 11 OPERATIONAL INFORMATION 1. Patronage a. Total Passengers b. Revenue Passengers c. Youth Passengers d. Elderly Passengers e. Handicapped Passengers 2. Vehicle Miles a. Total Vehicle Miles b. Revenue Vehicle Miles 3. Revenue Vehicle Hours 4. Revenue Vehicle Fuel Consumption a. Compressed Natural Gas b. Gasoline 5. Fare Collection a. Base b. Zone c. Youth d. Senior e. Handicapped f. Monthly Pass g. Other h. Average Fare Actuals Actuals Proposed FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 FY 2006/07 441,236 350,137 400,000 325,160 267,377 290,000 n/a n/a n/a 92,492 88,676 90,000 included above included above included abov 599,708 543,232 550,000 588,092 509,466 515,000 53,066 50,242 52,000 103,321 92,701 100,000 26,990 23,047 20,000 $.50/$2.00 $1.00/ $5.00 $1.00/$5.00 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a $.25/$1.00 $.50/$1.50 $.50/$1.50 see above see above see above $35.00/$17.50 $35.00/$17.5C DAR 10 ride ticket $12 $.66/$1.55 $.63/$1.62 $.68/$1.62 12 THREE YEAR FISCAL PLAN FY2006/07 FY2007/08 FY2008/09 Operating Expenses $2,982,607 1 $3,100,000 $3,130,000 Operating Revenues Sources LTF 1,736,989 1,800,000 1,800,000 STA 38,224 40,000 40,000 Federal (5307) 697,194 770,000 800,000 Fares 421,000 440,000 440,000 General Fund Other 89,200 50,000 50,000 Total $2,982,607 $3,100,000 $3,130,000 Capital Expenses $1,712,917 $900,000 $1,000,000 Capital Revenue Sources LTF 1,210,111 300,000 300,000 STA Federal 502,806 600,000 700,000 Other Total 1$1,712,917 $900,000 1$1,000,000 13 FLEET INVENTORY (Transit Vehicle Owners Only) Make & Model Year Vehicles Fuel Type Standard Seat Capacity # Wheelchair Postitions Ramp Y/N Lift Y/N CNG DAR Buses 2001 6 CNG 48 24 n NABI low floor 2000 5 CNG 185 10 y n Amtrans Senator 1991 1 CNG 33 2 n Ford Senator 1996 2 UNL 44 10 n Ford Senator 1996 3 UNL 66 6 n Ford E-350 1995 5 CNG 16 10 n Ford E-350 1995 2 CNG 16 4 n Dupont Trolley 2001 1 CNG 37 2 n TOTAL 25 VEHICLES TO BE PURCHASED IN FY 2006/07 Make & Model Year Vehicles Standard # Fuel Type Seat Wheelchair Ramp Y/N Lift Y/N Capacity Postitions Ford Cutaway 2005/06 8 CNG Ford Cutaway 2006/07 2 CNG 30' DAR bus 2006/07 3 CNG 14 ARTICLE 4 OPERATOR TDA REQUIREMENTS (Not Applicable to Lodi in FY 06/07; Fare Ratio/Local Support Requirements all Article 4 Claimants are required to maintain a specified ratio of fare revenue to operating cost. In addition, SMART only is required to maintain a ratio of fare revenue plus local support to operating cost of 32%. See 99268.2 - 99268.19 for details and exemptions pertaining to ratios. A. What is this system's required farebox recover ratio? B. Does this attached budget demonstrate that this system will meet its required farebox recovery and for SMART its farebox plus local support ratios? C. Has this system utilized its grace period? D. has this system been in non-compliance with its required ratio? If yes, identify the year or years 2. Extension of Service/New Service An extension of service or new service is exempt from the required farebox and local support ratios if: A. The extension of service or new service has been in operation for less than two full fiscal years. The two-year extension of services exclusion applies until two years after the end of the fiscal year in which the extension of services was put into operation B. The claimant submits a report on the extension of services to the COG within 90 days after the end of the fiscal year. (for details of the report, see 6633.8(b)) Is an extension of service/new services being claimed? If so, has the required report been submitted for the most recently completed full fiscal year If not, that report must accompany this claim 15 ARTICLE 4 OPERATOR TDA REQUIREMENTS (Not Applicable to Lodi in FY 06/07) 3. Operator's STA Qualifying Criteria (99314.6) Explanation A transit operator must meet one of two efficency standards before STA funds may be allocated for operating purposes: A. The operator's operating cost per revenue vehicle hour, in the latest year for which audited data are available, must not exceed the sum of the preceding year's operating cost per revenue vehicle hour and an amount equal to the change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI)* for the San Francisco Region, multiplied by the preceding year's operating cost per revenue vehicle hour. The formula below accomplishes this exercise: (opcost/RVH)FY05 cannot exceed [(opcost/RVH)FY04] * [1.00239] OR B. The operator's average operating cost per revenue vehicle hour, in the latest three years for which audited data are available, must not exceed the sum of the average of the operating cost per revenue vehicle hour for the three years preceding the latest year for which audited data are available and an amount equal to the average change in the CPI for the same period. The formula below accomplishes this exercise: AVG(opcost/RVH)FY03,04, 05 cannot exceed {AVG(opcost/RVH)FY02,03,04} * {1.0138} As used here, Operating Costs are defined by PUC Section 99247: All costs in the operating expense object classes exclusive of the costs in the depreciation and amorization expense object class, and exclusive of all direct costs for providing charter services, and exclusive of all vehicle lease costs. STA allows for other exclusions, to be granted by the SJCOG, if deemed appropriate. These additional operating cost exclusions include: 1. Exclusion of cost increases beyond the change in the CPI for fuel, alternative fuel programs, insurance, or state and federal mandates. 2. Exclusion of start-up costs for new services for a period of not more than two years (refer to PUC Section 99268.8 for a definition of new service). If you wish to claim these exclusions when calculating the operation cost per revenue vehicle hour, you must state the rquest and show calculations in support of the cost to be excluded. * Percentage change across fiscal years using the California CPI 16 ARTICLE 4 OPERATOR TDA REQUIREMENTS (Not Applicable to Lodi in FY 06/07; Pursuant to PUC Section 99314.6(c), funds withheld from allocation to an operator for failure to meet the STA efficiency criteria will be retained by SJCOG for reallocation to that operator for two years following the year of ineligibility. Any STA funds not allocated before the commencement of the third year following the year of the eligibility shall be reallocated to cost effective, high priority regional transit activities, as determined by SJCOG. The following documents pertain to the new STA efficiency standards and are available at your request: PUC Section 99314.6, also known as Cahapter 35 Statutes of 1991 (SB 3 -Kopp) The Uniform System of Accounts for Public Transit Operators. Consumer Price Index Data for California, January 1981 through December, 2006. Transportation Developmetn Act Audit Reports, FY1992 through FY2005 Please complete the attached worksheet to determine if you fully qualify for your STA apportionment. TDA Audit reports will address this efficiency criteria. 17 3. Operator's STA Qualifying Criteria (99314.6) - Worksheet (N/A to Lodi in Fy 06/07) FISCAL YEAR 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 (Audited Data) A. Operating Cost B. Operating Costs Exclustions: C. Adjusted Operating Cost (A -B) D. Revenue Vehicle Hours (RVH) E. RHV Exclusions: (add sheets if required) F. Adjusted RHV (D -E) G. Operating Cost per RVH (C/F) 0000 Efficiency Standard 1: Z must be less than or equal to (Y) * (1.00239) Show calculation Efficiency Standard 2: [ (X + Y + Z) / 3] must be less than or equal to (W +X +Y) * (1.0138) Show calculation For SJCOG use only Operator qualifies under: Standard 1 Yes No Standard 2 Yes No 18 4. Fifteen Percent Expenditure Increase (6632) If any of the line items on the attached budget exceed by more than 15% the expenditure for that same item in the previous year's budget, then an explanation for that increase must be given below. Attach an extra page if necessary. 5. Narrative Description (6632) Please describe in the space below any changes in service characteristics four the previous fiscal year. This should specifically include any substantial increase or decrease in the geographic area served, major changes to the scope of operations, or addition of major new fixed facilities. Please attach an additional page if necessary. 6. Certification by the California Highway Patrol (6632) Please attach a certification from the CHP verifying that the operator is in compliance with Section 1808.1 of the California Vehicle Code. This section concerns the "Driver Pull Notice participation" Is a Certificate Attached? Yes No SPECIAL NOTES FOR RATIO CALCULATIONS SMART Exclude certain costs and fares as specified in the most recent Compliance Audit Report 19 Article 8 Contractor TDA Requirements For contracted transportation service providers, the San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG) Executive Board has waived the farebox and local support ratios as it is empowered to do by 99405(c) The SJCOG Board has extablished a twostep process NOTE: Contributing claimants should proceed to page 23 1. Match Requirement For any Article 8 transit claim, no more than 90% of the total operating funds (minus depreciation) in the budget may be TDA (LTF and STA) derived. The ten percent (10%) or more matching funds may come from any other source available to the claimant besides TDA. 2. Operating Cost Per Passenger Objective To receive an amount of TDA operating funds (LTF and STA combined) in excess of what was claimed the previous fiscal year, the claimant must establish an operating cost per passenger objective for the fiscal year of the claim. "Operating cost" is defined as in TDA statutes and regulations. The objective should be a realistic one based on current and past system performance, but should be low enough to represent an "improvement" when warranted. The COG Board will adopt the system -wide operating cost per passenger objective for the fiscal year of the claim. Operating cost per passenger objectives must be established by November of each fiscal year. If the system failed to meet its operating cost per passenger objective in the fiscal year prior to the fiscal year of the claim, then the claimant is only eligible to file a claim for the level of TDA operating funding received in that prior fiscal year. In case of a unified transit system, each claimant would be limited to the prior year's level of TDA operating funding. If a system wishes to be eligible for increased TDA operating funding in a future fiscal year, then the claimant should indentify an operating cost per passenger objective. a. What was the level of TDA operating funding received previous fiscal year for this system by this claimant (LTF and STA)? $1,521,818 b. Does the attached budget information demonstrate at least a 10% match of non -TDA funds in FY 2005-2006? yes Does the FY 2006-2007 budget demonstrate a 10% match of TDA funds? yes C. Is this claim requesting more TDA operating funds than were received for this system by this claimant in the previous fiscal year? yes d. If yes, did the ststem meet its operating cost per passenger objective in the previous fiscal year? yes (An affirmative answer should be documented in Part "e" 20 Article 8 Contractor TDA Requirements e. What was the last year's Operating Cost per Passenger Objective ? $10.83 What was the actual operating cost per passenger? I. FY 2005-2006 Operating Cost $ 2,582,657 ii. Total Passengers 350,137 III. Operating Cost per Passenger $ 7.38 (1/11) f. What is the Operating Cost per Passenger Objective for this claim? IV. Budgeted Operating Cost $ 3,003,265 V. Estimated Total Passengers 400,000 VI. Projected Operating Costs per Passei $ 7.51 (IV/V) VII. FY 2006-2007 OPERATING COST PER PASSENGER OBJECTIVE $ 10.83 THE PROJECTED 06/07 OPERATING COST PER PASSENGER (VI) MUST BE LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO THE FY 06/07 OPERATING COST PER PASSENGER OBJECTIVE (VII) VIII. If this claim is for a unified transit system *, has the contributing claimant been appraised of the planned system -wide objective set in VII. Above? n/a * If this claim is for a unified transit system (definition p23), all calculations and numbers for operating costs per passenger must include system totals 21 Article 8 Contractor TDA Requirements 3. Fifteen Percent Expenditure Increase (6632) If any of the line items on the attached budget exceed by more than 15% the expenditure for that same item in the previous year's budget, then an explanation for that increase must be given below. Attach an additional page if necessary. The 15% increases for the 2005/06 Fiscal Year occurred in the following areas: memberships, medical insurance, PERS, utilities, sublet service contracts and advertising. The increase in memberships is due to the City joining the California Transit Association this year. The increase in medical insurance was due to the change from employee +1 to employee +family. The rise in utilities was due to increases in water and sewer rates. PERS was due to normal increases in amounts paid to PERS per employee. The final increase was in advertising and was due to increased printing and newspaper costs due to service changes and the associated hearings/public notification requirements. 4. Narrative Description (6632) Please describe below any changes in service characteristics from the previous fiscal year This should specifically include any substantial increase or decrease in the geographic area major changes to the scope of operations, or additional of major new fixed facilities. 22 Article 8 Contractor TDA Requirements (Contributing Claimants) In the case of a "unified transit system," this page is to be used by the "contributing claimant" rather than pages 20 through 22. A "unified transit system" is defined as one that has the same fare structure throughout the service are, but whose TDA expenses are claimed separately by two different TDA claimants. Additionally, to qualify as a unified transit system, all system TDA funding must be claimed under Article 8 (both claimants). "Contributing claimant" is defined as the claimant contributing a minority of the unified transit system's TDA funds. The claimant furninshing the majority of TDA funds is defined as the "primary claimant" Currently, the following local transit services qualify as unified transit systems: FY 2006-2007 Unified Transit System This Page used by: Tracy Transit SMART Tracy Taxi SMART Escalon Public Transit System SMART Manteca Dial a Ride SMART Lathrop (Currently inactive) SMART "Contributing claimants" need to answer the following questions: Systemwide operating cost per passenger objective for Fly 2006-2007 identified in primary claimant's adopted transit claim (from that claim, page 21 (2) f. VII.) $ 2. Date of primary claimant's adopted transit claim (or anticipated future date, if not yet adopted) $ IMPORTANT; The operating cost per passenger objective indentified above (page 21, (2) f. VII) will be applied uniformly to the total of City and SMART TDA funds used by the unified transit system, to determine eligilbility for increased TDA funding as explained on page 20. Separate calculations will not be done for City and SMART 23 City of Lodi ANNUAL PROJECT AND FINANCIAL PLAN PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PROJECTS (Use additional forms as necessary) PART II Briefly describe all proposed projects and indicate proposed project expenditures for right of way acquisition and the construction of road and street projects. Project Title & Brief Description Project Limits Total Project Cost LTF Funds Utilized FY06/07 Sidewalk Repairs Various $127,000 $52,000 Church Street and Sacramento Street Lodi to Kettleman and Elm to Lockeford $ 487,000 $ 10,000 Signal Modifications Church Street and Lockeford Street $ 105,000 $ 25,000 Class II Bicycle Lanes Central Ave between Kettleman and Vine $ 22,000 $ 22,000 Citywide School Signage Various $ 48,000 $ 5,200 Various Bike/ Ped Projects Various $ 9,734 $ 9,734 TOTAL j $ 798,734 j $ 123,934 1. LTF carryover applied towards FY 2006/07 Pedestrian and Bicycle Projects 3. FY 2006/07 apportionment applied towards FY 2006/07 Non -motorized 4. Total of 1, 2 and 3 above (must match total LTF in Table 4 above) 24 $ 50,350 $ 121,934 CLAIMANT: ANNUAL PROJECT AND FINANCIAL PLAN ROADS AND STREETS PROJECTS (Use additional forms as necessary) PART III Briefly describe all proposed projects and indicate proposed project expenditures for right of way acquisition and the construction of road and street projects. Project Title & Brief Description Project Limits Total Project Cost LTF Funds Utilized FY06/07 Sidewalk Repairs Various 127,000 75,000 Church Street and Sacramento Street Lodi to Lockeford and Elm to Lockeford $ 487,000 $ 51,750 Lockeford/ Sacramento Traffic Signal Lockeford Street at Sacramento Street $ 299,000 $ 52,000 Signal Modifications Crescent/Lodi, Lodi/Stockton, Church/Kettleman $ 105,000 $ 80,000 ignal Cabinet/ Traffic Controller Replacemer $ 75,000 $ 75,000 Miscellaneous Traffic Improvements $ 5,000 $ 5,000 Miscellaneous Road Improvements $ 55,116 $ 55,116 TOTAL $ 1,153,116 1 $ 393,866 1. LTF carryover applied towards FY 2006/07 Roads and Streets 3. FY 2006/07 apportionment applied towards FY 2006/07 Roads and Streets 4. Total of 1, 2 and 3 above (must match total LTF in Table 4 above) 25 $ 243,866 $ 150,000 $ 393,866 PART IV - OTHER PURPOSES It is possible that a claimant may wish to expend TDA funds for puposes allowed within the Act, but not covered by the three previous parts. TDA funds may be claimed under Article 8 consistent with Section 99400 of the TDA. To complete this section, on attached pages, identify: I. Project Title II Applicable subdivision of section 994400 III Project Description IV Estimated total Costs V TDA Contribution to that total A separate page of pages should be submitted for each specific project or purpose It is strongly recommended that the claimant consult with SJCOG staff before completing this section Other Article 8 (99400) 26 RESOLUTION NO. 2006-203 A RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO FILE THE 2006-07 CLAIM FOR TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT FUNDS FROM LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND AND FROM STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF LODI NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lodi City Council does hereby approve and authorize the City Manager to file claim for the City of Lodi's 2006-07 Transportation Development Act funds in the amount of $3,536,183 from the Local Transportation Fund and $40,785 from State Transit Assistance; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Lodi City Council does hereby authorize the City Manager to execute the claim on behalf of the City of Lodi. Dated: November 15, 2006 I hereby certify that Resolution No. 2006-203 was passed and adopted by the Lodi City Council in a regular meeting held November 15, 2006, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — Beckman, Hansen, Johnson, Mounce, and Mayor Hitchcock NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None r40%i RANDI JOHL City Clerk 2006-203