HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - October 6, 2004 E-10AGENDA ITEM EGOND
CITY OF LODI
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
TM
AGENDA TITLE: Adopt Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to File Claim for 2004105
Transportation Development Act (TDA) Funds in the Amount of $2,229,362
from the Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and $6,482 from State Transit
Assistance (STA)
MEETING DATE: October 6, 2004
PREPARED BY: Public Works Director
RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the
City Manager to file a claim for the 2004/2005 Transportation
Development Act (TDA) funds in the amount of $2,229,362
(including $122,000 in unexpended carryover) from
Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and $6,482 from State Transit Assistance (STA).
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Each year, the City of Lodi receives an apportionment of TDA funds
to support Lodi's transit operations and pedestrian/bicycle costs.
These are State transportation funds that are primarily for
non -vehicular transportation but can be used on roads if those other
needs are being met. They are channeled through the Council of Governments, our regional
transportation planning agency. The claim for fiscal year 200412005, including pedestrian/bike,
unexpended carryover and 3% for San Joaquin Council of Governments planning, is $2,229,362 from
LTF and $6,482 from STA. A copy of the claire is attached.
The City Council should be aware that our transit operations, Dial -A -Ride and GrapeLine, are fully funded
with formula dollars from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), TDA, and other competitive sources of
funds. Transit is not dependent on any General Fund money. We intend to continue to use TDA funds
for transit, pedestrian, and bicycle -related projects and maintenance, as much as possible.
FUNDING: None required.
Prepared by Tiffani M. Fink, Transportation Manager
RCPITMFIpmf
Attachment
cc: Finance Director
City Engineer
APPROVED:
41m� �)
Richard C. Prima, Jr.
Public Works Director
S. Keeter, Interim City Manager
J '\TRANS IMC2005TDA.doc F 9124/2004
LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND
TO: San Joaquin Council of Governments
555 E. Weber Avenue
Stockton, CA 95202
FROM: City of Lodi, California
(applicant)
ADDRESS: 221 West Pine Street Lodi, CA 95240
(city, zip)
CONTACT PERSON: Tiffani M. Fink, Trans Mqr PHONE: (209) 333-6800 x 2678
The City of Lodi, California hereby requests, in accordance
with Chapter 1400, Statutes 1971 and applicable rules and regula-
tions, that its annual transportation claim be approved in the
amount of $ 2,157,372.00 for fiscal year 2004/2005 , to be drawn
from the Local Transportation Fund.
When approved, please transmit this claim to the County Auditor for
payment. Approval of the claim and payment by the County Auditor
to this applicant is subject to such monies being on hand and
available for distribution, and to the provisions that such monies
will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved
annual financial plan.
The claimant certifies that this Local Transportation Fund claim
and the financial information contained therein, is reasonable and
accurate to the best of my knowledge, and that the aforementioned
information indicates the eligibility of this claimant for funds
for the fiscal year of the application pursuant to CAC Section 6634
and 6734.
APPROVED:
San Joaquin Council
of Governments
By:
JULIA E. GREENE
Executive Director
Date:
Applicant:
Signed:
20
N
Name:
Janet S. Keeter
Title: Interim City Manager
Date:
20
STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE CLAIM
TO: San Joaquin Council of Governments
555 E. Weber Avenue
Stockton, CA 95202
FROM: City of Lodi, California
(applicant)
ADDRESS: 221 West Pine Street Lodi, CA 95240
(city, zip)
CONTACT PERSON: Tiffani M. Fink, Trans Mgr PHONE: (209) 333-6800 x 2678
This claimant, qualified pursuant to Sections 99313.6, 99314.5
and 99314.6 of the Public Utilities Code, hereby requests, in
accordance with Chapter 1400, Statutes of 1971 as amended, and
applicable rules and regulations, that an allocation be made in
the amount of $ 6.482.00 for fiscal year 2004/2005 to be
drawn from the State Transit Assistance trust fund of San Joaquin
County.
Allocation instruction and payment by the County Auditor to this
claimant are subject to such monies being on hand and available for
distribution, and to the provisions that such monies will be used
only in accordance with the terms of the approved claim.
The claimant certifies that this State Transit Assistance Fund
Claim and the financial information contained herein, is reasonable
and accurate to the best of my knowledge, and that the aforemen-
tioned information indicates the eligibility of this claimant for
funds for the fiscal year of the application pursuant to CAC
Section 6634 and 6734.
APPROVED:
San Joaquin Council
of Governments
JULIA E. GREENE
Executive Director
Date: 20
Applicant:
Signed:
7
Name:
Janet S. Keeter
Title: Interim Citv Manaqer
Date: 20
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT APPORTIONMENTS
I. Local Transportation Fund Available Apportionment
A. Area Apportionment 2004-2005 $ 1,932,805.00
B. Pedestrian/Bicycle Apportionment 41,027.00
C. Previous Years' Unclaimed Apportionment 71,990.00
D. Unexpended Carryover 122,000.00
E. 3% for COG Transit Planning 61,540.00
F. Total Available for 2004-2005 Claim(s) 2,229,362.00
G. Less any LTF Already Claimed 2004-2005 ( 0 )
H. TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR THIS CLAIM $ 2,229,362.00
(Also enter on page 9, 1st column)
I. Actual net funds available (H-D-E=I) $ 2,045,822.00
II. State Transit Assistance Fund Available Apportionment
A.
Area Apportionment 2004-2005 $
0
B.
Special Operator Apportionment 2004-2005
5,166.00
C.
Previous Years' Unclaimed Apportionment
1,316.00
D.
Unexpended Carryover
0
E.
2% of A. Claimed on Behalf of
0
COG for Transit Planning
F.
Total Available for 2004-2005 Claim(s) (
6,482.00 )
G.
Less any STA Already Claimed 2004-2005 (
0 }
H.
TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR THIS CLAIM $
6,482.00
(Also enter on page 9, 2nd column)
I.
Actual net funds available (H-D-E=I ) $
6,482.00
.11
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT ALLOCATIONS
Claim Purpose
I. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
Article 4 (99260) -Operator'
CCR Sec 6730(a) Public Transit
Article 8 (99400( c ))
Contractor operating
Article 8 (99400(e))
Contractor capital
Article 8 (99400(b))
Passenger Rail Service
Operations & Capital
TDA Administration
II. PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE
Article 3 (99234)
III. ROADS AND STREETS
Article 8 (99400(a))
IV. OTHER
Article 8 (99400(b,c,d,e))
TOTAL THIS CLAIM
TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR THIS CLAIM
(from page 8, I. H. and II. H.)
I. LTF II. STA
U
6,482.00
1,782,805.00 N/A
0 N/A
0 N/A
61,540.00 0
80,027.00 N/A
233,000.00 N/A
0
2,229,362.00 6,482.00
UNCLAIMED APPORTIONMENT
(TOTAL AVAIL. less TOTAL THIS CLAIM) 71.990.00 0
IMPORTANT: To avoid accidental overpayment, please identify and itemize in the
space below any unexpended carryover included in the amounts being claimed
above. Identify the amount of carryover and the purpose for which it is being
reclaimed. Attach pages as necessary.
LTF in Transit Fund to be reclaimed for $
LTF in Street & Road Fund reclaimed for Streets and Roads $ 83,000.00
LTF in Ped/Bike Fund reclaimed for Bike/Ped $ 39,000.00
STA in Transit Fund reclaimed for $
TOTAL UNEXPENDED CARRYOVER $122'90aa
Operators claiming STA funds must meet qualifying criteria (PUC Section
99314.6). Page 17 of this form must be completed.
9
PART I - PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
PLEASE CIRCLE EITHER:
Article 4 Operator
Article 8 Contractor
I. OPERATING REVENUE
401 Passenger Fares
402 Special Transit Fares
405 Charter Service Revenues
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
2003-2004
PLEASE CIRCLE 2004-2005
ACTUAL or ESTIMATE BUDGET
406 Auxiliary Transportation
Revenues (includes advertising)
407 Non -Transportation Revenues
408 Tax Revenue (Specify:)
Property Tax
Sales Tax (not TDA)
409 Local Grants & Reimbursements
Purchase of Service
Local Transportation Fund(LTF)
410 Local Special Fare Assistance
411 State Cash Grants & Reimb.
State Transit Assistance (STA)
Other
412 State Special Fare Assistance
413 Federal Grants & Reimbursements
(Specify) FTA Grants
430 Contributed Services (Not Cash)
440 Subsidy from other Sector of
Operations
TOTAL
II. CAPITAL REVENUE
464 Capital Grants & Subsidies
Specify Fed, State, Local:
Federal Transit Admin
State Transit Assistance (STA)
Local Transportation Fund (LTF)
Non -Governmental Donations
TOTAL
10
$303,261.68 $300,000.00
29,949.69
1,802,895.00 1.7820805.00
5,609.00 6,482.00
11,056.36 10,000.00
310,440.76 444.314 On
2,462,212.49 2,543,601.00
55,000.00
55,000.00
III.
OPERATING EXPENSES
2003-2004
PLEASE CIRCLE
2004-2005
Actual or Estimate
Budget
501
Labor
Operators Salaries/Wages
Other Salaries/Wages
-108,2r76.75
502
Fringe Benefits
6,739.00
19,385.00
503
Services
189,576.98
185.097.40
504
Materials/Supplies
Fuels/Lubricants
144,167_g7
115 nnn on
Tires/Tubes
Other
931-1792-20
170,000.00
505
Utilities
58,634.69
28,305.00
506
Casualty/Liability Costs
108,807.00
110,000.00
507
Taxes
508
Purchased Transportation Service
1,615.759.39
i'800,000 00
509
Miscellaneous Expenses
38,252.01
26,588.60
510
Expense Transfers
511
Interest Expense
512
Leases and Rentals
513
Depreciation/Amortization
Operator Funds
Grant Funds
TOTAL
2,462,212.49
2,543,601.00
IV.
CAPITAL EXPENSES
Debt Service
Land/Property Acquisition
Vehicles
Construction
55,000.00
Other
TOTAL
55,000.00
*Allowable capital expenses are limited for Article 8 claimants; see 99400 (e).
11
OPERATIONAL INFORMATION*
Actual Actual/Est. Proposed
FY 2002-03 FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05
1. Patronage
a. Total Passengers
520,886
493,552
520,000
b. Revenue Passengers
352,102
390,000
c. Youth Passengers
d. Elderly Passengers
48.305
89.728
90,000
e. Handicapped Passengers
Included in
Elderly Passenger Count
2. Vehicle Miles
a. Total Vehicle Miles
613,500
620,000
b. Revenue Vehicle Miles
599,882
605,000
3. Revenue Vehicle Hours
48.788
52.224
55,000
4. Revenue Vehicle Fuel
Consumption
a.--Die=r- CNG
102,212.7
105,000
b. Gasoline
272529.6
30,000
5. Fare Structure
a. Base
_ 5n.42 _ M
50/2 00
-5n,19 _ 00
b. Zone
c. Youth
d. Senior
.25/ 1.00
.25/ 1.00
.25/ 1.00
e. Handicapped
2,5.1 1-00
_ 25/ 1 -nn
.25/ 1-00
f. Monthly Pass
$20 General/
$10 Senior/Disabled/ Medicare
g. Other
h. Average Fare
.30/ 1.36
.35/ 1.25
.35/ 1.30
*Attach additional pages as necessary to alter or complete description
12
THREE YEAR FISCAL PLAN
13
2004-05
2005-2006
2006-2007
Operating
Expenses
$
2-54.1,601-00
$
$
2,600,000.00
Operating
Revenues:
Sources:
LTF
$
1,782,805.00
$
1,750,000.00$
1,900,000.00
STA
6,482.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
Federal
444,314.00
595,000.00
395,000.00
Fares
300,000.00
250,000.00
inn n n_nn
General Fund
Other
Total
$
2,543,601.00
$
2,600,000.00$
2,600,000.00
Capital Expenses
$
55.000.00
$
5n0 n�0.on $
hnn,nno-on
Capital Revenue
Sources:
LTF
$
$
$
STA
Federal
559000.00
500,000.00
600,000.00
Other
Total
$
55,000.00
$
500,000.00 $
600,000.00
13
FLEET INVENTORY
(Transit Vehicle Owners Only)
Make & Model
Year
# of
Vehicles
Fuel
Type
Standard
Seat
Capacity
# Wheel-
chair
Positions
Ramp
(y/n)
Lift
(y/n)
CNG DAR Buses
2001
6
CNG
48
24
n
y
NABI Low Floor
2000
5
CNG
185
10
y
n
Amtrans Senator
1991
1
CNG
33
2
n
y
Senator
1996
2
UNL
44
10
n
-Ford
Ford Senator
1996
3
UNL
66
6
n
y
Ford E-350
1995
5
CNG
16
10
n
Ford E-350
1995
2
CNG
16
4
n
y
Dupont Trolley
2001
1
CNG
37
2
n
TOTAL
NA
25
NA
Vehicles to be Purchased in FY 2004-2005
14
ARTICLE 4 OPERATOR TDA REQUIREMENTS
1. Fare Ratio/Local Support Requirements
All Article 4 claimants are required to maintain a specified ratio
of fare revenue to operating cost. In addition, SMART only is
required to maintain a ratio of fare revenue plus local support to
operating cost of 32%. See 99268.2 - 99268.19 for details and
exemptions pertaining to ratios.
A. What is this system's required farebox recovery ratio?
B. Does the attached budget demonstrate that this system will
meet its required farebox recovery and for SMART its farebox
plus local support ratios?
C. Has this system utilized its grace year?
D. Has this system been in non-compliance with its required
ratio?
If yes, identify the year or years
2. Extension of Service/New Service
An extension of service or new service is exempt from the
required farebox and local support ratios if:
A. The extension of service or new service has been in operation
for less than two full fiscal years. The two-year extension
of services exclusion applies until two years after the end
of the fiscal year in which the extension of services was put
into operation.
B. The claimant submits a report on the extension of services
to the COG within 90 days after the end of the fiscal year.
(For details of the report, see 6633.8(b)).
Is an extension of service/new service being claimed?
If so, has the required report been submitted for the most
recently completed full fiscal year? If not, that
report must accompany this claim.
15
3. Operator's STA Qualifying Criteria (99314.6) EXPLANATION
A transit operator must meet one of two efficiency standards before
STA funds may be allocated for operating purposes:
A) The operator's operating cost per revenue vehicle hour, in
the latest year for which audited data are available, must
not exceed the sum of the preceding year's operating cost
per revenue vehicle hour and an amount equal to the change
in the Consumer Price Index (CPI)' for the San Francisco
Region, multiplied by the preceding year's operating cost
per revenue vehicle hour. The formula below accomplishes
this exercise:
(opcost/RVH)FY03 5 [(opcost/RVH)FY02] * [1.00202] OR
B) The operator's average operating cost per revenue vehicle
hour, in the latest three years for which audited data are
available, must not exceed the sum of the average of the
operating cost per revenue vehicle hour for the three
years preceding the latest year for which audited data are
available and an amount equal to the average change in the
CPI for the same period. The formula below accomplishes
this exercise:
AVG(opcost/RVH)FY01,02,03 5 {AVG(opcost/RVH)FY00,01,02)
{1.0401)
As used here, Operating Costs are defined by PUC Section 99247:
All costs in the operating expense object classes exclusive
of the costs in the depreciation and amortization expense
object class, and exclusive of all direct costs for providing
charter services, and exclusive of all vehicle lease costs.
STA allows for other exclusions, to be granted by the COG, if
deemed appropriate. These additional operating cost exclusions
include:
1) Exclusion of cost increases beyond the change in the CPI
for fuel, alternative fuel programs, insurance, or state
and federal mandates.
2) Exclusion of start-up costs for new services for a period
of not more than two years (refer to PUC Section 99268.8
for a definition of new service).
If you wish to claim these exclusions when calculating the
operation cost per revenue vehicle hour, you must state the
request and show calculations in support of the cost to be
excluded.
t Percentage change across fiscal years using the California CPI.
16
Pursuant to PUC Section 99314.6 m), funds withheld from alloca-
tion to an operator for failure to meet the STA efficiency
criteria will be retained by COG for reallocation to that
operator for two years following the year of ineligibility. Any
STA funds not allocated before the commencement of the third year
following the year of the eligibility shall be reallocated to
cost effective, high priority regional transit activities, as
determined by the COG.
The following documents pertain to the new STA efficiency standards
and are available at your request:
PUC Section 99314.6, also known as Chapter 35 Statutes of
1991 (SB 3 -Kopp) .
The Uniform System of Accounts for Public Transit Operators.
Consumer Price Index Data for California, January, 1981
through February, 2004.
Transportation Development Act Audit Reports, FY 1992 through
FY 2003.
Please complete the attached worksheet to determine if you fully
qualify for your STA apportionment. TDA Audit reports will
address this efficiency criteria.
17
3. Operator's STA Qualifying Criteria (99314.6) - WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR: 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05
(use
audited data)
A.
Operating Cost
B.
Operating Cost
Exclusions:
1.
2.
3.
4.
C.
Adjusted Operating
Cost (A -B)
D.
Revenue Vehicle
Hours (RVH)
E.
RVH Exclusions:
1.
2.
3.
(if
more, show on separate
sheet
F.
Adjusted RVH
(D -E)
G.
Operating Cost
per RVH
(C=F)
W
Efficiency Standard 1:
Z must be less than or equal to (Y)*(1.00202)
Show calculation:
Efficiency Standard 2:
[(X+Y+Z)=3] must be less than or equal to <(W+X+Y)=3)>*(1.0401)
Show calculation:
___=====For COG use
Operator qualifies under: Standard 1 Yes No
Standard 2 Yes No
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
4. Fifteen Percent Expenditure Increase (6632)
If any of the line items on the attached budget exceed by more than 15%
the expenditure for that same item in the previous year's budget, then
an explanation for that increase must be given below. Attach an extra
page if necessary.
The budgeted salaries reflect a greater than 15% increase over the actual
expenditures for the prior year. This is due to the City budgeting personnel -
costs at the top step for the upcoming years. The City expects the actual to
be within the 15% expenditure ratio for actual at the end of the fiscal year.
5. Narrative Description (6632)
Please describe in the space below any changes in service characteris-
tics from the previous fiscal year. This should specifically include
any substantial increase or decrease in the geographic area served,
major changes to the scope of operations, or addition of major new fixed
facilities. Please attach an additional page if necessary.
6. Certification by the California Highway Patrol (6632)
Please attach a certification from the CHP verifying that the
operator is in compliance with Section 1808.1 of the California
Vehicle Code. This section concerns the "Driver's Pull Notice
participation"
Is a Certificate Attached? Yes XX No
SPECIAL NOTES FOR RATIO CALCULATIONS
SMART - Exclude certain costs and fares as specified in the most
recent Compliance Audit Report.
19
Article 8 Contractor TDA Requirements
For contracted transportation service providers, the San Joaquin
Council of Governments' Executive Board has waived the farebox and
local support ratios as it is empowered to do by 994050). The COG
Board has established a two-step process.
NOTE: Contributing claimants should proceed to page 23.
1. Match Requirement
For any Article 8 transit claim, no more than 90% of the total
operating funds (minus depreciation) in the budget may be TDA (LTF
and STA) derived. The ten percent or more matching funds may come
from any other source available to the claimant besides TDA.
2. Operating Cost Per Passenger Objective
To receive an amount of TDA operating funds (LTF and STA combined)
in excess of what was claimed the previous fiscal year, the
claimant must establish an operating cost per passenger objective
for the fiscal year of the claim. "Operating cost" is defined as
in the TDA statutes and regulations. The objective should be a
realistic one based on current and past system performance, but
should be low enough to represent an "improvement" when warranted.
The COG Board will adopt the system -wide operating cost per
passenger objective for the fiscal year of the claim. Operating
cost per passenger objectives must established by November of each
fiscal year.
If the system failed to meet its operating cost per passenger
objective in the fiscal year prior to the fiscal year of the claim,
then the claimant is only eligible to file a claim for the level of
TDA operating funding received in that prior fiscal year. In the
case of a unified transit system, each claimant would be limited to
the prior year's level of TDA operating funding. If a system
wishes to be eligible for increased TDA operating funding in a
future fiscal year, then the claimant should identify an operating
cost per passenger objective.
a. What was the level of TDA operating funding received in the
previous fiscal year for this system by this claimant (LTF
plus STA) ? $ 11808,001.00
b. Does the attached budget information demonstrate at least a
10% match of non -TDA funds in FY 2003-04? yPs
Does the FY 2004-2005 budget demonstrate a 10% match of non -
TDA funds? yes
RA
C. Is this claim requesting more TDA operating funds than were
received for this system by this claimant in the previous
fiscal year? no
d. If yes, did the system meet its operating cost per passenger
objective in the previous fiscal year?
(An affirmative answer should be documented in Part "e".)
e. What was the last year's Operating Cost per Passenger Objec-
tive? $8.65
What was the actual operating cost per passenger?
I.
FY 2003-2004 Operating Cost
$ 2,462,212.49
ii.
Total Passengers
493,552.00
iii.
Operating Cost Per Passenger
(I /ii)
$ 8.73
f. What
is the Operating Cost per Passenger
Objective for this
claim?
iv.
Budgeted Operating Cost
$ 2,543,601.00
V.
Estimated Total Passengers
520,000.00
vi.
Projected Operating Cost
per Passenger (iv/v)
$ 4.89
vii.
FY 2004-2005 OPERATING COST PER
PASSENGER OBJECTIVE
$ 8.97
THE
PROJECTED 04-05 OPERATING COST PER PASSENGER
(vi) MUST BE
LESS
THAN OR EQUAL TO THE 04-05 OPERATING
COST PER PASSENGER
OBJECTIVE
(vii) !
viii. If this claim is for a unified transit system', has
the contributing claimant been appraised of the
planned system -wide objective set in vii. above?
n/a
I If this claim is for a unified transit system (definition page 23), all
calculations and numbers for operating costs per passenger must include system
totals.
21
3. Fifteen Percent Expenditure Increase (6632)
If any of the line items on the attached budget exceed by more than
15% the expenditure for that same item in the previous year's
budget, then an explanation for that increase must be given below.
Attach an additional page if necessary.
The difference in salaries of greater than 15% is due to the City practice of
budgeting at the top step for salaries. The City expects actual costs to be
within the 15% threshold for actual at the end of the fiscal year.
4. Narrative Description (6632)
Please describe below any changes in service characteristics from
the previous fiscal year. This should specifically include any
substantial increase or decrease in the geographic area served,
major changes to the scope of operations, or addition of major new
fixed facilities.
22
ARTICLE 8 CONTRACTOR TDA REQUIREMENTS (CONTRIBUTING CLAIMANTS)
In the case of a "unified transit system," this page is to be used
by the "contributing claimant" rather than pages 20 through 22. A
"unified transit system" is defined as one that has the same fare
structure throughout the service area, but whose TDA expenses are
claimed separately by two different TDA claimants. Additionally,
to qualify as a unified transit system, all system TDA funding must
be claimed under Article 8 (both claimants). "Contributing
claimant" is defined as the claimant contributing a minority of the
unified transit system's TDA funds. The claimant furnishing the
majority of TDA funds is defined as the "primary claimant."
Currently, the following local transit services qualify as unified
transit systems:
FY 2004-2005 Unified Transit Systems This Page Used by:
Tracy Transit SMART
Tracy Taxi SMART
Escalon Public Transit System SMART
Manteca Dial a Ride SMART
Lathrop (Currently inactive) SMART
"Contributing claimants" need to answer the following questions:
1. Systemwide operating cost per passenger objective for FY
2004-2005 identified in primary claimant's adopted transit
claim
(from that claim, page 21, (2) f. vii.)
2. Date of primary claimant's adopted transit claim (or antici-
pated future date, if not yet adopted)
IMPORTANT•
The operating cost per passenger objective identified above (page
21, (2) f. vii) will be applied uniformly to the total of City
and SMART TDA funds used by the unified transit system, to
determine eligibility for increased TDA funding as explained on
page 20. Separate calculations will not be done for City and
SMART.
23
PART II - PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PROJECTS
LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND
Project Title & Description
FNew Sidewalk Installation
Lockeford/Calaveras Ped Crosswalk
Turner/ Loma Pedestrian Improvements
Project Limits
Assorted
e additional paqes if necessary
24
LTF Cost
'total cost
$72,000/100,000
$2,400/ 26,000
$5,627/ 30,000
LTF Cost
Total Cost : $80,027/ 156,000
PART III - ROAD AND STREET PROJECTS
Please provide the requested information for each project being
identified for Transportation Development Act funding.
LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND
Pro]ect Titie & Description
Pine Street Overlay
Downtown Street Improvements
Pine Street North
Lodi/ Mills Signal Interconnect
Audible Ped Signal
Lockeford/ Calaveras Crosswalk
Downtown Street Improvements
Pine Street South
Misc Traffic and Parking Lot Projects
LTF Cost
Project Listing Totai Lost
$74,000/200,000
$30,000/ 65,000
$13,505/ 204,944
$ 2,200
$ 5,000/ 27,000
$ 58,000
$ 50,295
LTF Cost _ I $233,000/606,439
Total Cost
(Use additional pages if necessary)
25
PART IV - OTHER PURPOSES
It is possible that a claimant may wish to expend TDA funds for
purposes allowed within the Act, but not covered by the three
previous parts. TDA funds may be claimed under Article 8 consis-
tent with section 99400 of the TDA. To complete this section, on
attached pages, identify:
I. Project title
ii. Applicable subdivision of section 99400
iii. Project description
iv. Estimated total cost
V. TDA contribution to that total
A separate page or pages should be submitted for each specific
project or purpose.
It is strongly recommended that the claimant consult with COG staff
before completing this section.
MATDA\TDA-05\td aclm05.wpd
26
RESOLUTION NO. 2004-200
A RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO FILE
THE 2004-05 CLAIM FOR TRANSPORTATION
DEVELOPMENT ACT FUNDS ON BEHALF OF
THE CITY OF LODI
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lodi City Council does hereby
approve the City's 2004-05 Transportation Development Act (TDA) claim for Local
Transportation Funds (LTF) in the following amounts:
$2,229,362.00 Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds (including
$122,000 in unexpended carryover)
$ 6,482.00 State Transit Assistance (STA)
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Lodi City Council does hereby authorize the
City Manager to execute the claim on behalf of the City of Lodi.
Dated. October 6, 2004
I hereby certify that Resolution No. 2004-200 was passed and adopted by the Lodi
City Council in a regular meeting held October 6, 2004, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — Beckman, Hitchcock, and Howard
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS — Land and Mayor Hansen
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None
SUSAN J. BLACKSTON
City Clerk